<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Acquires Financial News &amp; Info Search Technology Firm Relegence; Between $50-100 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2006/11/08/aol-acquires-financial-news-info-search-technology-firm-relegence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2006/11/08/aol-acquires-financial-news-info-search-technology-firm-relegence/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Fulton</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2006/11/08/aol-acquires-financial-news-info-search-technology-firm-relegence/#comment-45622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic Fulton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 22:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2006/11/08/aol-acquires-financial-news-info-search-technology-firm-relegence/#comment-45622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A patent play? I seem to remember Relegence claiming they had secured patents on ranking of news based on its popularity and other real-time search engine techniques (a quick USPTO reveals two patents). With the search fight going strong, real-time search might be the next big thing, so perhaps that is part of the reasoning?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A patent play? I seem to remember Relegence claiming they had secured patents on ranking of news based on its popularity and other real-time search engine techniques (a quick USPTO reveals two patents). With the search fight going strong, real-time search might be the next big thing, so perhaps that is part of the reasoning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
