<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube&#039;s Vaporware About Vaporshare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.S. Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/#comment-47324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.S. Hoffman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/#comment-47324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter what people say about the revenue potential of small user-gen clips, the lust for fame far out weighs the piddly amount that most users make from posting their content on Revver.  Think about it.... would you rather have everyone talking about you or have $34.85 in your pocket?

The answer is clear.  For now, fame rules the roost.  And until there&#039;s big money in little videos, this equation won&#039;t change.

The Hoff

www.zannel.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what people say about the revenue potential of small user-gen clips, the lust for fame far out weighs the piddly amount that most users make from posting their content on Revver.  Think about it&#8230;. would you rather have everyone talking about you or have $34.85 in your pocket?</p>
<p>The answer is clear.  For now, fame rules the roost.  And until there&#39;s big money in little videos, this equation won&#39;t change.</p>
<p>The Hoff</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zannel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zannel.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pramit</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/#comment-47323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pramit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/01/29/youtube-contributors-to-share-revenues/#comment-47323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your assessment.

The revenue-sharing idea was floated when Google bought Youtube last year.
http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-9-more-things-to.html
http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-ultimate-roundup.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessment.</p>
<p>The revenue-sharing idea was floated when Google bought Youtube last year.<br />
<a href="http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-9-more-things-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-9-more-things-to.html</a><br />
<a href="http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-ultimate-roundup.html" rel="nofollow">http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-ultimate-roundup.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
