http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/ The economics of digital content Sat, 25 May 2013 17:04:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47442 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:40:14 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47442 Yep, Gary it is good to have this kind of useful info with us. name 20.com is a reference to a couple of things: Web 2.0, 20 companies or talent that might be developed, and then possibly the amount of money, though we have not been able to confirm the last part.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47441 Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:20:41 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47441 Yeah it is very good idea. It is very useful information and very beneficial to any working people.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47440 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:03:04 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47440 je cherch une mitier gentier moi mécanicien générale spisien

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47439 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:01:53 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/01/calacaniss-new-company-20com/#comment-47439 It depends on how they structure the equity but it would seem like this could easily become an achilles heel. If the equity is worth more at X date than it is on the day the producer received it the likelihood of that producer pursuing liquidity is greater than it was on the day of the grant. Assuming that happens, what incentive is left for that producer to stay and continue adding value? Unless they do success based equity distribution whereby they grant equity on a regular basis at FMV at the time and guage the amount on advertising revenue. That may prove tough to scale but will be interesting to watch.

]]>