<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IDG No Longer A Print Company; Online 35 Percent Of U.S. Publishing Revenues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Crawford</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/#comment-47674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/#comment-47674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rex,  You are absolutely correct the Expo and Events business are very critical revenue and profit compenents for IDG - but even in the important face to face events area - we are looking at the tight integration of the web with the offline events.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,  You are absolutely correct the Expo and Events business are very critical revenue and profit compenents for IDG &#8211; but even in the important face to face events area &#8211; we are looking at the tight integration of the web with the offline events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/#comment-47673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex Hammock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/11/419-idg-no-longer-a-print-company-online-35-percent-of-us-publishing-revenu/#comment-47673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was on the board of American Business Media when it changed its name from American Business Press. The reason: Even then (six or so years ago), no more than 50% of total B2B media company revenues came from traditional print advertising in B2B magazines. All types of data, tradeshows and events, online and other revenue sources were eclipsing traditional print even then. I&#039;m a bit surprised IDG would define themselves as &quot;web centric&quot; however. Those events are real money machines for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on the board of American Business Media when it changed its name from American Business Press. The reason: Even then (six or so years ago), no more than 50% of total B2B media company revenues came from traditional print advertising in B2B magazines. All types of data, tradeshows and events, online and other revenue sources were eclipsing traditional print even then. I&#39;m a bit surprised IDG would define themselves as &quot;web centric&quot; however. Those events are real money machines for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
