<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @ 3GSM: EA, Real Pan Networks Over Mobile Game Carriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/15/419-3gsm-ea-real-pan-networks-over-mobile-game-carriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/15/419-3gsm-ea-real-pan-networks-over-mobile-game-carriage/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bridges</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/02/15/419-3gsm-ea-real-pan-networks-over-mobile-game-carriage/#comment-47813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bridges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/02/15/419-3gsm-ea-real-pan-networks-over-mobile-game-carriage/#comment-47813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a moment there I thought I was back in 2002.

How old is this argument ?

More telling is that depsite us smaller players having been banging on about this for a few years, now the big-boys - who already have a privileged position with the operators - are finding the same thing.

There&#039;s one simple answer - and something the Ego of operators might not like but their pockets might appreciate:

The operator should only be a provider of bandwidth and server space. I should be able to rent space - at fixed visible rates - and then be visibly responsible for my own content pages and releases.

The operators are BAD at delivering web sites, wap sites and responsive time-scales for content - even the big players will have up to 3 months or more to wait on many sites just to get a new game up. 3 months is a long time when you have several $100k invested in a project - esp if there is a planned followup to the game.


Operators maybe should own the mall, but all the content and provision should be provided by the lessees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a moment there I thought I was back in 2002.</p>
<p>How old is this argument ?</p>
<p>More telling is that depsite us smaller players having been banging on about this for a few years, now the big-boys &#8211; who already have a privileged position with the operators &#8211; are finding the same thing.</p>
<p>There&#39;s one simple answer &#8211; and something the Ego of operators might not like but their pockets might appreciate:</p>
<p>The operator should only be a provider of bandwidth and server space. I should be able to rent space &#8211; at fixed visible rates &#8211; and then be visibly responsible for my own content pages and releases.</p>
<p>The operators are BAD at delivering web sites, wap sites and responsive time-scales for content &#8211; even the big players will have up to 3 months or more to wait on many sites just to get a new game up. 3 months is a long time when you have several $100k invested in a project &#8211; esp if there is a planned followup to the game.</p>
<p>Operators maybe should own the mall, but all the content and provision should be provided by the lessees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
