<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast Unhappy With Google On Search Deal; Talking To MSN; Other Ad Inventory Talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/03/19/419-comcast-unhappy-with-google-on-search-deal-talking-to-msn-other-ad-inve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/03/19/419-comcast-unhappy-with-google-on-search-deal-talking-to-msn-other-ad-inve/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/03/19/419-comcast-unhappy-with-google-on-search-deal-talking-to-msn-other-ad-inve/#comment-48544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Caswell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/03/19/419-comcast-unhappy-with-google-on-search-deal-talking-to-msn-other-ad-inve/#comment-48544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This goes to show just how big Google&#039;s share is in ad revenue deals. A move from $70 million to $100 million means Google has plenty of wiggle room (Comcast wouldn&#039;t be asking for more than Google already gets). Further analysis here:

http://www.computers.net/2007/03/comcast_unhappy.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This goes to show just how big Google&#39;s share is in ad revenue deals. A move from $70 million to $100 million means Google has plenty of wiggle room (Comcast wouldn&#39;t be asking for more than Google already gets). Further analysis here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computers.net/2007/03/comcast_unhappy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.computers.net/2007/03/comcast_unhappy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
