<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times To Close TimesSelect Effective Midnight Tuesday; Will Open Last 20 Years Of Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: everloss review</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[everloss review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tend to think this is a good call on their part, as you guys would be aware, putting large quantities of content on an established site is a sure fired recipe for a large traffic growth.  I always tend to think quality traffic must come first, followed my monetization latter.  I guess when your sacrificing $10mil in subscription revenue for this concept, it&#039;s a bigger test of that belief than I&#039;ll ever have to face, but I think they made the right move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think this is a good call on their part, as you guys would be aware, putting large quantities of content on an established site is a sure fired recipe for a large traffic growth.  I always tend to think quality traffic must come first, followed my monetization latter.  I guess when your sacrificing $10mil in subscription revenue for this concept, it&#39;s a bigger test of that belief than I&#39;ll ever have to face, but I think they made the right move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria A Oppong</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria A Oppong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[l need help for my delivery  cheag es la in Ghana  l need your for
payment for my  winning  prize   ,delivery  cheages    l need your  help
for  payment   for my  delive     reg  no 238057      VAT NO 808823319
ACT  Reg   No  z8456502  thank  you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>l need help for my delivery  cheag es la in Ghana  l need your for<br />
payment for my  winning  prize   ,delivery  cheages    l need your  help<br />
for  payment   for my  delive     reg  no 238057      VAT NO 808823319<br />
ACT  Reg   No  z8456502  thank  you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moses Kagan</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moses Kagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like this may not be the best time for the Times to open up all this new inventory. Alleyinsider, among others, have been talking about the coming decline in adspend, which they argue is presaged by a decline in eCPMs at AOL. Lost subs rev plus declining CPMs = ouch. Check out moseskagan.com for more analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like this may not be the best time for the Times to open up all this new inventory. Alleyinsider, among others, have been talking about the coming decline in adspend, which they argue is presaged by a decline in eCPMs at AOL. Lost subs rev plus declining CPMs = ouch. Check out moseskagan.com for more analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Garfunkel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/09/18/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/#comment-53219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All true, but remember that the Times is getting an average, per print subscriber, of $500 in subsciption fees and $1000 in advertising to reach that subscriber. What are the comparable numbers for online?

Ad revenue in the &quot;Other&quot; category was $4m in August (I presume that&#039;s from NYT.com). We&#039;ll see how the Sept. and Oct. numbers come out.

While this may signal the end of tiered &lt;i&gt;content&lt;/i&gt; for paying subscribers, it shouldn&#039;t close the door on all tiered offerings. As a paying subscriber, I&#039;d still like *some* online benefit, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/PaperTrust&quot;&gt;less intrusive ads or unmoderated comment posting&lt;/a&gt;. Mobile users will be soon demanding the former. With the restricted bandwidh/screens, readers should not have to waste any space on ads (though I&#039;d be happy as a clamshell phone to get ads show up *outside* my browsing experience to defray the mobile web charges).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All true, but remember that the Times is getting an average, per print subscriber, of $500 in subsciption fees and $1000 in advertising to reach that subscriber. What are the comparable numbers for online?</p>
<p>Ad revenue in the &quot;Other&quot; category was $4m in August (I presume that&#39;s from NYT.com). We&#39;ll see how the Sept. and Oct. numbers come out.</p>
<p>While this may signal the end of tiered &lt;i&gt;content&lt;/i&gt; for paying subscribers, it shouldn&#39;t close the door on all tiered offerings. As a paying subscriber, I&#39;d still like *some* online benefit, like &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://civilities.net/PaperTrust&quot;&gt;less" rel="nofollow">http://civilities.net/PaperTrust&quot;&gt;less</a> intrusive ads or unmoderated comment posting&lt;/a&gt;. Mobile users will be soon demanding the former. With the restricted bandwidh/screens, readers should not have to waste any space on ads (though I&#39;d be happy as a clamshell phone to get ads show up *outside* my browsing experience to defray the mobile web charges).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
