<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wal-Mart Cancels Video Download Service; HP Says Wasn&#039;t Worth Powering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/#comment-55891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/#comment-55891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve tried services like Vongo, AT&amp;T;broadband, and so forth the big problem was outdated content. Neither Vongo, or at&amp;t;broadband has recent content or would of kept them.    Personally even if Walmart came out with a good service I wouldn&#039;t spend a dime on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve tried services like Vongo, AT&amp;T;broadband, and so forth the big problem was outdated content. Neither Vongo, or at&amp;t;broadband has recent content or would of kept them.    Personally even if Walmart came out with a good service I wouldn&#39;t spend a dime on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kontra</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/#comment-55890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kontra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2007/12/28/419-wal-mart-cancels-video-download-service-hp-says-wasnt-worth-powering/#comment-55890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a frenzy to catch up with Apple, the industry hasn’t learned much from the PlaysForSure debacle by watching Microsoft abandon its own DRM and introduce Zune with a new and incompatible system to compete directly against its erstwhile digital music “partners.” In another instance of mortgaging success to others’ willingness or ability to innovate, AOL recently moved its struggling video service to Amazon Unbox which in turn is based on Microsoft’s PlaysForSure.

The irony here is that Wal-Mart relied on HP that relied on Microsoft and AOL relies on Amazon that relies on Microsoft which itself no longer relies on its own PlaysForSure. When a core component of a product or service depends on the rate of innovation of another party over which you have no control or influence, it’s time to rethink strategy. It’s also time to ask yourself, twice or thrice removed from core competency, should you really be in such a business?

Strategic design risks (1): Wal-Mart’s foolhardy reliance on “partners”
http://counternotions.com/2007/12/28/walmart-video/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a frenzy to catch up with Apple, the industry hasn’t learned much from the PlaysForSure debacle by watching Microsoft abandon its own DRM and introduce Zune with a new and incompatible system to compete directly against its erstwhile digital music “partners.” In another instance of mortgaging success to others’ willingness or ability to innovate, AOL recently moved its struggling video service to Amazon Unbox which in turn is based on Microsoft’s PlaysForSure.</p>
<p>The irony here is that Wal-Mart relied on HP that relied on Microsoft and AOL relies on Amazon that relies on Microsoft which itself no longer relies on its own PlaysForSure. When a core component of a product or service depends on the rate of innovation of another party over which you have no control or influence, it’s time to rethink strategy. It’s also time to ask yourself, twice or thrice removed from core competency, should you really be in such a business?</p>
<p>Strategic design risks (1): Wal-Mart’s foolhardy reliance on “partners”<br />
<a href="http://counternotions.com/2007/12/28/walmart-video/" rel="nofollow">http://counternotions.com/2007/12/28/walmart-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
