<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @ EconSM: Interview: Ron Grant, President, AOL: Bebo Will Return Us To Our Roots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wealthy Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wealthy Affiliate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently the word is being said that AOL is in deep trouble,and due to this very reason AOL decided to refloat itself on the stock market so that it could offload its problems on to the shareholders. Whether this is true or not, I don&#039;t know. However the very first comment on this post suggests that that may very well be the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently the word is being said that AOL is in deep trouble,and due to this very reason AOL decided to refloat itself on the stock market so that it could offload its problems on to the shareholders. Whether this is true or not, I don&#8217;t know. However the very first comment on this post suggests that that may very well be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jump</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Jump]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[âAlliances: Google recently added AOLâs money channel into Google Finance. Grant regards it as validation of the companyâs transition efforts as well. Grant: âGoogle called us up and said youâve done a great job with the redesign. There was a small acquisition we did within that that really elevated the site, called Relegence. [A news site does] an interesting story, Relegance can find it, pick it up and place it into our finance site.â Thanks folks, great interview.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>âAlliances: Google recently added AOLâs money channel into Google Finance. Grant regards it as validation of the companyâs transition efforts as well. Grant: âGoogle called us up and said youâve done a great job with the redesign. There was a small acquisition we did within that that really elevated the site, called Relegence. [A news site does] an interesting story, Relegance can find it, pick it up and place it into our finance site.â Thanks folks, great interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search insider</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[search insider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This search thing is silly.  AOL was losing search share.  The change stabliized the share and it is now growing.  Google will win here anyway hence the yahoo sell out to microsoft.  The change didn&#039;t cost $100MM.  The short term change impact is not eight figures let alone nine.  There is targeted programming and it is resultling in 6 months of growth and double digit year over year growth.  The ad strategy is easily understood and now under lynda can be executed.  Bebo reportedly had numerous offers.  Eric your comments make no sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This search thing is silly.  AOL was losing search share.  The change stabliized the share and it is now growing.  Google will win here anyway hence the yahoo sell out to microsoft.  The change didn&#39;t cost $100MM.  The short term change impact is not eight figures let alone nine.  There is targeted programming and it is resultling in 6 months of growth and double digit year over year growth.  The ad strategy is easily understood and now under lynda can be executed.  Bebo reportedly had numerous offers.  Eric your comments make no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/04/30/419-econsm-interview-ron-grant-president-aol/#comment-59858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is such a puff piece, no questions about falling revenues, lack of strategy, staff moral, why Ron changed search and lost $100MM in one quarter, why he didn&#039;t correct search, why so much for Bebo, (something that was on the block for $330MM just months before, and still people rejected it, ), lack of targeted programming, advertisers inability to understand AOL&#039;s placement strategy?  I expected more from PC, such a puff piece.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a puff piece, no questions about falling revenues, lack of strategy, staff moral, why Ron changed search and lost $100MM in one quarter, why he didn&#39;t correct search, why so much for Bebo, (something that was on the block for $330MM just months before, and still people rejected it, ), lack of targeted programming, advertisers inability to understand AOL&#39;s placement strategy?  I expected more from PC, such a puff piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
