<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Either Most Popular News Site, Or Amongst Least &#8211; Who Knows?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Andrews</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/#comment-60216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/#comment-60216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun Online got in touch to say comScore&#039;s figures are for UK traffic whilst ABCe bottom lines give global figures. Having jettisoned overseas traffic, Sun Online pointed out it placed fourth in March...

Guardian - 7,731,573
Telegraph - 6,045,285
The Times - 5,631,264
The Sun - 5,256,154
the Mail - 5,105,385]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun Online got in touch to say comScore&#39;s figures are for UK traffic whilst ABCe bottom lines give global figures. Having jettisoned overseas traffic, Sun Online pointed out it placed fourth in March&#8230;</p>
<p>Guardian &#8211; 7,731,573<br />
Telegraph &#8211; 6,045,285<br />
The Times &#8211; 5,631,264<br />
The Sun &#8211; 5,256,154<br />
the Mail &#8211; 5,105,385</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Lachmann</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/#comment-60215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Lachmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/05/13/419-sun-either-most-popular-news-site-or-least-who-knows/#comment-60215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the magazines mentioned in the article, the SUN stands out as the one that has gone the furthest in implementing social networking functionalities. A comparison could be made with the biggest online paper in the Nordics, Aftonbladet (www.aftonbladet.se). In a country with 9 million people they have a WEEKLY audience of close to 4 million UVs. Part of this is for historical reasons, they grew up quickly, but a big part of this is that they have been really quick and extensive in letting the readers and user in to comment, discuss, blog and interact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the magazines mentioned in the article, the SUN stands out as the one that has gone the furthest in implementing social networking functionalities. A comparison could be made with the biggest online paper in the Nordics, Aftonbladet (www.aftonbladet.se). In a country with 9 million people they have a WEEKLY audience of close to 4 million UVs. Part of this is for historical reasons, they grew up quickly, but a big part of this is that they have been really quick and extensive in letting the readers and user in to comment, discuss, blog and interact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
