<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Going For Hydrogen Winter: Raises Another $22.7 Million From McGraw-Hill, Among Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/#comment-64300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/#comment-64300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for linkedin to bring in some more money while they can. Although I wonder what the use of proceeds is going to be - same as usual or acquiring some competitors (e.g. XING)? And for our friends at Paidcontent - first &quot;nuclear&quot; (I know that was Marc Andreesen), now hydrogen - that&#039;s just plain dumb. How about old fashioned &quot;tough times&quot; or &quot;recession&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for linkedin to bring in some more money while they can. Although I wonder what the use of proceeds is going to be &#8211; same as usual or acquiring some competitors (e.g. XING)? And for our friends at Paidcontent &#8211; first &quot;nuclear&quot; (I know that was Marc Andreesen), now hydrogen &#8211; that&#39;s just plain dumb. How about old fashioned &quot;tough times&quot; or &quot;recession&quot;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital bear</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/#comment-64299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[digital bear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/10/23/419-linkedin-going-for-hydrogen-winter-raises-another-27-million-from-mcgra/#comment-64299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems less like them preparing for a nuclear winter than their investors looking to bring a bomb to their LPs and shareholders.  LinkedIn hasn&#039;t been able to effectively go contextual, vertical, get over the lingering site latency, maintain a consistent executive suite or deploy Web2.0 tools-- haven&#039;t these investors been sold a bill of goods, again?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems less like them preparing for a nuclear winter than their investors looking to bring a bomb to their LPs and shareholders.  LinkedIn hasn&#39;t been able to effectively go contextual, vertical, get over the lingering site latency, maintain a consistent executive suite or deploy Web2.0 tools&#8211; haven&#39;t these investors been sold a bill of goods, again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
