<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch: WSJ.com Making Over $100 Million From Ads, &#8216;Probably&#8217; $100 Million In Subscription Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Espinhas</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Espinhas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is he /are you now saying that in the space of 6 weeks the ad target has gone from being an ambition to an achievement? And that annualised sub revenues have gown 25% in just 40 days?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he /are you now saying that in the space of 6 weeks the ad target has gone from being an ambition to an achievement? And that annualised sub revenues have gown 25% in just 40 days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert ivan</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert ivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I too would like clarification on this gigantic leap in revenue.   are we assuminig the subscription revenue is calculated simply as:   $1.99 x 52 weeks x 1,000,000subscribers? 

Thanks, 
Robert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I too would like clarification on this gigantic leap in revenue.   are we assuminig the subscription revenue is calculated simply as:   $1.99 x 52 weeks x 1,000,000subscribers? </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teresa fellows</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teresa fellows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa - on the 17 September  you published an article quoting Rupert as saying that the WSJ could one day generate more than $100 million in ad revenue and that the site likely generated $80 million in sub revenue.  Is he /are you now saying that in the space of  6 weeks the ad target has gone from being an ambition to an achievement? And that annualised sub revenues have gown 25% in just 40 days?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa &#8211; on the 17 September  you published an article quoting Rupert as saying that the WSJ could one day generate more than $100 million in ad revenue and that the site likely generated $80 million in sub revenue.  Is he /are you now saying that in the space of  6 weeks the ad target has gone from being an ambition to an achievement? And that annualised sub revenues have gown 25% in just 40 days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Stamoulis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/11/06/419-murdoch-wsjcom-making-over-100-million-in-advertising-probably-100-mill/#comment-64510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is amazing but WSJ is a giant brand and people are willing to pay for great financial information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is amazing but WSJ is a giant brand and people are willing to pay for great financial information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
