<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Reaction: Among Ad Execs, Bartz Stirs Mostly Doubts, Some Hopes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/#comment-65897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/#comment-65897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Cohen&#039;s comments are a JOKE! This guy is full of nonsense. Bartz is a terrible choice because they needed a product visionary, plain and simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Cohen&#39;s comments are a JOKE! This guy is full of nonsense. Bartz is a terrible choice because they needed a product visionary, plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/#comment-65896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/01/14/419-yahoo-react-bartzs-selection-considered-safe-uninspiring/#comment-65896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doubts/hopes among ad executives? Maybe this is the best recommendation for Bartz and the future of Yahoo -- which is NOT and must NOT be another advertising company, second or third to Google and the rest of the online &quot;ad-pushers&quot;

If I may suggest something ;-), the best for Yahoo would be to focus now on contet, premium content, in particular, leaving the rest (that is, the cesspool of misinformation and user-generated blah-blah) to Google to profit from it. 

Primum content plus micropayments, built based on the huge and loyal group of Yahoo users, could make Yahoo the numebr one Internet destination and a real healthy business again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doubts/hopes among ad executives? Maybe this is the best recommendation for Bartz and the future of Yahoo &#8212; which is NOT and must NOT be another advertising company, second or third to Google and the rest of the online &quot;ad-pushers&quot;</p>
<p>If I may suggest something ;-), the best for Yahoo would be to focus now on contet, premium content, in particular, leaving the rest (that is, the cesspool of misinformation and user-generated blah-blah) to Google to profit from it. </p>
<p>Primum content plus micropayments, built based on the huge and loyal group of Yahoo users, could make Yahoo the numebr one Internet destination and a real healthy business again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
