<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes Media-Backed FlipGloss Launches Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/#comment-66842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/#comment-66842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s product-placement slideshows! Yay!

Seriously, it&#039;s fairly well done, but I think Flickr does annotated photos much better. And the time required to create those masked rollovers is not worth it. That idea alone could sink the whole venture.

I&#039;m curious about how they&#039;re going to approach the whole issue of ad/edit separation. Seems like a nightmare. But maybe Forbes is thinking about ditching ASME, just like Hachette ditched MPA?

Does anyone but me think this new &quot;strategy&quot; of launching without any idea of who the advertising partners might be is a bad idea? Not exactly strategic thinking in these tough times. How FlipGloss relates to the larger Forbes Media family is another, bigger question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s product-placement slideshows! Yay!</p>
<p>Seriously, it&#39;s fairly well done, but I think Flickr does annotated photos much better. And the time required to create those masked rollovers is not worth it. That idea alone could sink the whole venture.</p>
<p>I&#39;m curious about how they&#39;re going to approach the whole issue of ad/edit separation. Seems like a nightmare. But maybe Forbes is thinking about ditching ASME, just like Hachette ditched MPA?</p>
<p>Does anyone but me think this new &quot;strategy&quot; of launching without any idea of who the advertising partners might be is a bad idea? Not exactly strategic thinking in these tough times. How FlipGloss relates to the larger Forbes Media family is another, bigger question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital bear</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/#comment-66841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[digital bear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/02/19/419-forbes-media-backed-flipgloss-launches-beta/#comment-66841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty site.  Not sure it warrants going to a destination but can imagine getting lost looking at pictures they have on an iPhone (though they don&#039;t have an App in the AppStore, yet.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty site.  Not sure it warrants going to a destination but can imagine getting lost looking at pictures they have on an iPhone (though they don&#39;t have an App in the AppStore, yet.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
