<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schmidt: Google Would Be &#8216;Happy&#8217; To Work With Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: free virtual worlds for kids</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[free virtual worlds for kids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the &quot;micropayments&quot; and &quot;other forms of subscription models&quot; only refers to the YouTube side of the business. As they continue to link up with studios, possibly to provide more online media content (from big-name studios), Google would have to pay some kind of subscription to the studios in order to stream content from these studios. Of course whether the cost of subscription to the content should go to the end-user or not is to be debated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &quot;micropayments&quot; and &quot;other forms of subscription models&quot; only refers to the YouTube side of the business. As they continue to link up with studios, possibly to provide more online media content (from big-name studios), Google would have to pay some kind of subscription to the studios in order to stream content from these studios. Of course whether the cost of subscription to the content should go to the end-user or not is to be debated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting? Or hypocritical... After so many years of an active campaign against premium content and micropayments  (remember Mr. Shirky&#039;s &quot;theory&quot; that micropayments will never work bcs people hate being nickel-and-dimed?), after so much noise against online content as something that matters and has to be paid for -- now Google &quot;considers&quot; micropayments and paid subscription models. Hypocrites!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting? Or hypocritical&#8230; After so many years of an active campaign against premium content and micropayments  (remember Mr. Shirky&#39;s &quot;theory&quot; that micropayments will never work bcs people hate being nickel-and-dimed?), after so much noise against online content as something that matters and has to be paid for &#8212; now Google &quot;considers&quot; micropayments and paid subscription models. Hypocrites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/17/419-earnings-google-call/#comment-68915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.........Interesting]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
