Comments on: From Boardroom To Courtroom: A Retrospective Of The Motorola/Paul Liska Affair http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/ The economics of digital content Fri, 24 May 2013 23:44:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Paul Liska is The Man!!!! http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69303 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:17:08 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69303 Q1 numbers were released today–they sucked. Looks like Paul Liska is telling the truth and Greg Brown is the one telling lies.

]]> By: Wings Set You Free V2 http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69302 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:29:33 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69302 I strongly encourage all Motorola engineers to embrace records retention! Of course a wise security policy would have all critical data archived at a safe, remote location ;-)

]]> By: Pierre D http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69301 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:57:53 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69301 Interesting. I think most employee have a USB drive and Nortorn Ghost and the employee is responable to back up his own PC. Company has a Records policy which mandates you to remove unused / unwanted files at least once a year from your PC and they have controls to ensure you state that you comply . Email server should have back-up copy of all emails though? Unless they were deleted as well in accordance with the RECORDS Policy. If so it looks like the RECORDS policy backfired on Motorola. And before handing it in I would certainly try to remove all data from my Laptop PC in accordance with the company policy.

]]> By: Crypto http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69300 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:35:52 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69300 quote: March 9, 2009
quote: The plot thickens: Motorola claims that Liska is, in fact, a whistle blower!

No this is not quite right.

It is Liska who *claimed* that Motorola said he was a whistle blower. So that he could then say he was fired since he let the cat out of the bag.

However, since Motorola was completely truthful and actually were initially protecting Liska by saying he was let go due to the failed merger, I can see how Analysts have stated that this will not affect Motorola, since they did nothing wrong.

]]> By: unemployed American http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69299 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:50:14 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69299 Hopefully this will all expose Motorola's practice of laying off Americans while bringing in more H1B visa applicants. As far as this latest bit of smearing Liska's character….Motorola backs up the data on everyone's computer. If this isn't done, one can only blame Liska's boss…. Of course, on my last day at Motorola, my boss asked me to back up my data onto a CD.

One CD? Motorola: the Titan of Stupidity

]]> By: Charlie http://paidcontent.org/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69298 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:51:58 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/04/29/419-hello-moto-goodbye-moto-the-paul-liska-motorola-soap-opera-heats-up/#comment-69298 Regarding the Feb 22,2008 timeline….if it's the CFO's mandate to increase sales, can anyone be surprised this relationship did not work? Or was this mandate mis-stated by the author?

]]>