<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earnings: Glu Mobile Sees Carrier Sales Rebounding While Emerging App Store Sales Remain Small</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia Duryee</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Duryee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought I&#039;d weigh in here...I find it interesting that Glu decided to take a &quot;wait and see&quot; attitude to see if the iPhone, and in particular the App Store. They are being punished for being conservative. But hindsight is 20/20, right? What if it didn&#039;t take off? Glu would be looking smart for not jumping on the bandwagon. 

Seb, as for your question, there is a reason why some of their games aren&#039;t coming out on the iPhone. For some games, they don&#039;t have permission to use the brands on the iPhone, even though they are allowed to build the games for other platforms. I think this is pretty greedy on behalf of the IP owners. If you want a successful game partner -- like Glu or some other company -- then you should reward them with the chance to make money on the iPhone, too. Instead, I hear they separate it out, so they can make money on the brand twice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I&#39;d weigh in here&#8230;I find it interesting that Glu decided to take a &quot;wait and see&quot; attitude to see if the iPhone, and in particular the App Store. They are being punished for being conservative. But hindsight is 20/20, right? What if it didn&#39;t take off? Glu would be looking smart for not jumping on the bandwagon. </p>
<p>Seb, as for your question, there is a reason why some of their games aren&#39;t coming out on the iPhone. For some games, they don&#39;t have permission to use the brands on the iPhone, even though they are allowed to build the games for other platforms. I think this is pretty greedy on behalf of the IP owners. If you want a successful game partner &#8212; like Glu or some other company &#8212; then you should reward them with the chance to make money on the iPhone, too. Instead, I hear they separate it out, so they can make money on the brand twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seb</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what i dont&#039; get i how come they didn&#039;t bring out any of their big brands on iPhone?  according to their website they have stuff like Sonic, Dinersdash, call of duty and a whole slew of other stuff.  conservative? i&#039;d say lethargic is more like it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i dont&#39; get i how come they didn&#39;t bring out any of their big brands on iPhone?  according to their website they have stuff like Sonic, Dinersdash, call of duty and a whole slew of other stuff.  conservative? i&#39;d say lethargic is more like it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sure but they should have made that call over 12 months ago. Gameloft and EA moved far more quickly and the french guys have said iphone is now their leading money driver.  what gives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure but they should have made that call over 12 months ago. Gameloft and EA moved far more quickly and the french guys have said iphone is now their leading money driver.  what gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/07/419-earnings-glu-mobile-q1/#comment-69770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are still conservative when it comes in forecasting their revenues despite of $20.8 million  earnings for the 1st quarter.  Absolutely, they made the right decision in focusing on smartphones sales.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are still conservative when it comes in forecasting their revenues despite of $20.8 million  earnings for the 1st quarter.  Absolutely, they made the right decision in focusing on smartphones sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
