<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Microsoft&#8217;s M&amp;A Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: londonestateagents</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/#comment-70222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[londonestateagents]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/#comment-70222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great article - they have bouhgt around 15 companies this year alone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article &#8211; they have bouhgt around 15 companies this year alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Bob</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/#comment-70221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doctor Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/05/18/419-how-microsoft-decides-to-buy-startups/#comment-70221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSFT should buy WBMD. MSFT is in this business but not doing well. WBMD is well entrenched as #1 with both consumers and doctors with no real competition. They are slow but steady with conservative management. Stock is way down although still expensive so I cant comment on the price but its a good strategic fit. And of course, price is all relative when you have a Mt. Everest sized pile of cash as Ballmer does...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSFT should buy WBMD. MSFT is in this business but not doing well. WBMD is well entrenched as #1 with both consumers and doctors with no real competition. They are slow but steady with conservative management. Stock is way down although still expensive so I cant comment on the price but its a good strategic fit. And of course, price is all relative when you have a Mt. Everest sized pile of cash as Ballmer does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
