<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Latest Ambition: A Universal Commenting System For The Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonh</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sidewiki - Crabzy - same but less powerfull.
I believe Sidewiki is nothing more than what offers Crabzy, and even less because Crabzy offers forum&#039;s functionalities, where you can have dialogs, exchanges between users.
I&#039;d rather go to Crabzy.com, but they both offer great value as this kind of service, if more developped, could really enrich the Web !!!!
For everyone&#039;s benefit !!!!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidewiki &#8211; Crabzy &#8211; same but less powerfull.<br />
I believe Sidewiki is nothing more than what offers Crabzy, and even less because Crabzy offers forum&#8217;s functionalities, where you can have dialogs, exchanges between users.<br />
I&#8217;d rather go to Crabzy.com, but they both offer great value as this kind of service, if more developped, could really enrich the Web !!!!<br />
For everyone&#8217;s benefit !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Martinsson</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Martinsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testar disqus]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testar disqus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devyn Cairns</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devyn Cairns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh come on, this is a direct copy of Hoodwink&#039;d!

Too bad _why is gone though... :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, this is a direct copy of Hoodwink&#39;d!</p>
<p>Too bad _why is gone though&#8230; :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this will fail/underperform as have many other Google products]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this will fail/underperform as have many other Google products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s just wait and see if they get any traction with this. There are a LOT more pages on the Web than people, and with maybe only 1% of users contributing at all, it will take *significant* adoption of Sidewiki for them to reach critical mass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#39;s just wait and see if they get any traction with this. There are a LOT more pages on the Web than people, and with maybe only 1% of users contributing at all, it will take *significant* adoption of Sidewiki for them to reach critical mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosredna</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nosredna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t that be &quot;complementary&quot; rather than &quot;complimentary?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t that be &quot;complementary&quot; rather than &quot;complimentary?&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Chase</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Replace &quot;Google&quot; with &quot;Microsoft&quot; in the article and everyone would be screaming bloody murder as they did when Microsoft tried a loosely similar capability (i.e., a centralized feature spanning multiple websites). This is bad for the web. Google does much good but this time they have stepped in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replace &quot;Google&quot; with &quot;Microsoft&quot; in the article and everyone would be screaming bloody murder as they did when Microsoft tried a loosely similar capability (i.e., a centralized feature spanning multiple websites). This is bad for the web. Google does much good but this time they have stepped in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed dunn</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed dunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While you guys wait for a unified/centralized solution, I&#039;ll just use the &quot;share&quot; button on this article and provide my comment to my inner circle on Twitter and Facebook...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you guys wait for a unified/centralized solution, I&#39;ll just use the &quot;share&quot; button on this article and provide my comment to my inner circle on Twitter and Facebook&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Andrews</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, annotation basically. As commenters have said, it&#039;s been tried since the mid/late 90s. But it tends to be browser-specific, which means it&#039;s never going to get mass adoption.

Which is not to say this isn&#039;t something we should *want*. Unified web profiles and messaging is something we need to move toward, and it takes the scale of something like a Google or a Facebook (or a Microsoft Passport) to do that. There&#039;s more likelihood of Facebook Connect or Google Friend Connect executing this global comments idea thamn Google&#039;s toolbar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, annotation basically. As commenters have said, it&#39;s been tried since the mid/late 90s. But it tends to be browser-specific, which means it&#39;s never going to get mass adoption.</p>
<p>Which is not to say this isn&#39;t something we should *want*. Unified web profiles and messaging is something we need to move toward, and it takes the scale of something like a Google or a Facebook (or a Microsoft Passport) to do that. There&#39;s more likelihood of Facebook Connect or Google Friend Connect executing this global comments idea thamn Google&#39;s toolbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marqueymarc</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marqueymarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/09/23/419-googles-latest-ambition-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web/#comment-74037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see this kind of thing resurface every year or two.  Third Voice was a notable attempt in &#039;99 and many more finely targeted systems have been built since, including Stickis by Activeweave, which I founded in 2005.   

We added the concept of ovelaying rich media comments on the page itself, and restricting visibility to a facebook &quot;friends&quot; like subset of subscribed users.   Very useful, but never gained mainstream traction, like many web annotation systems before and since. 

Someday someone will crack this and make it simple enough, and I believe it will change the way we use the web pretty fundamentally.   I suspect it wont be the text only and scattershot (everyone sees everything) approach described here, but great to see this being done.

Can&#039;t wait for the one that sticks!
Marc A. Meyer, ex-ceo Activeweave, Inc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see this kind of thing resurface every year or two.  Third Voice was a notable attempt in &#39;99 and many more finely targeted systems have been built since, including Stickis by Activeweave, which I founded in 2005.   </p>
<p>We added the concept of ovelaying rich media comments on the page itself, and restricting visibility to a facebook &quot;friends&quot; like subset of subscribed users.   Very useful, but never gained mainstream traction, like many web annotation systems before and since. </p>
<p>Someday someone will crack this and make it simple enough, and I believe it will change the way we use the web pretty fundamentally.   I suspect it wont be the text only and scattershot (everyone sees everything) approach described here, but great to see this being done.</p>
<p>Can&#39;t wait for the one that sticks!<br />
Marc A. Meyer, ex-ceo Activeweave, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
