<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview: Allbritton&#8217;s Jim Brady: What Politico Did For Political News, We Can Do For Local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revenue skeptic</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revenue skeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, another local product led by a highly experienced **editorial** talent. Didn&#039;t Sidewalk do that 13 years ago hiring former Post, LA Times, Atlanta Journal Constitution folks, etc. Jim is a top drawer talent but it&#039;s already been proven dozens of time that quality people can create quality content and people will view it on the web. Just as in newspapers when all the innovation was on the editorial side, we are doing the same thing with web-only offerings (i.e., no revenue innovation). 

When one of these local ventures launches with a true **business/revenue** innovator at the top, I&#039;m going to sit up and take notice. The revenue innovation is pathetic in the local arena. These guys are controversial but look at Glam. They at least are trying some new things. We need a Glam for local. Some player with similar innovation...rather than doing the tired old display ad model.

These local ventures aren&#039;t much different than dotcoms where they would say &quot;we&#039;ll build an audience and then figure out how to monetize it later&quot;. That&#039;s ok if you are the next google or twitter but I don&#039;t see how any investor would go down that same path. How about starting with the revenue model? Building quality content and traffic has been proven it can be done in 100&#039;s of places all over the web. Building a sustainable revenue model in local is a different story.

And who the hell cares what the name of it is? Lack of revenue innovation will result in the same story. That name is &quot;bankrupt&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, another local product led by a highly experienced **editorial** talent. Didn&#39;t Sidewalk do that 13 years ago hiring former Post, LA Times, Atlanta Journal Constitution folks, etc. Jim is a top drawer talent but it&#39;s already been proven dozens of time that quality people can create quality content and people will view it on the web. Just as in newspapers when all the innovation was on the editorial side, we are doing the same thing with web-only offerings (i.e., no revenue innovation). </p>
<p>When one of these local ventures launches with a true **business/revenue** innovator at the top, I&#39;m going to sit up and take notice. The revenue innovation is pathetic in the local arena. These guys are controversial but look at Glam. They at least are trying some new things. We need a Glam for local. Some player with similar innovation&#8230;rather than doing the tired old display ad model.</p>
<p>These local ventures aren&#39;t much different than dotcoms where they would say &quot;we&#39;ll build an audience and then figure out how to monetize it later&quot;. That&#39;s ok if you are the next google or twitter but I don&#39;t see how any investor would go down that same path. How about starting with the revenue model? Building quality content and traffic has been proven it can be done in 100&#39;s of places all over the web. Building a sustainable revenue model in local is a different story.</p>
<p>And who the hell cares what the name of it is? Lack of revenue innovation will result in the same story. That name is &quot;bankrupt&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafat Ali</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafat Ali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe me, we are trying...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me, we are trying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/10/29/419-interview-allbrittons-jim-brady-what-politico-did-for-political-news-we/#comment-74801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s  got to be a way we can get the scoop of what this new site will be called.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s  got to be a way we can get the scoop of what this new site will be called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
