<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @ Ad:tech: Jon Miller: People Will Pay For Premium Content &#8212; Kindle Is A Good Example</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FG</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/#comment-74968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/#comment-74968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the comment above. Nokia is another example, they own the hardware where the user is going to interact with the content, and they also own the distribution delivery through Nokia Music Store.

its very difficult to establish a successful content distribution platform solely on the web, without a hardware attached to it that will obligate users to consume content on the specific site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the comment above. Nokia is another example, they own the hardware where the user is going to interact with the content, and they also own the distribution delivery through Nokia Music Store.</p>
<p>its very difficult to establish a successful content distribution platform solely on the web, without a hardware attached to it that will obligate users to consume content on the specific site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed dunn</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/#comment-74967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed dunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/11/05/419-adtech-jon-miller-people-will-pay-for-premium-content-kindle-is-a-good/#comment-74967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Miller said &lt;i&gt;&quot;People are willing to pay for Kindle. For example, I pay for my Journal on the Kindle..&lt;/i&gt;

So he doesn&#039;t get an employee discount? The mobile premium SMS/WAP push industry already established this science years ago, can&#039;t we agree?  

With that said, can&#039;t we also argue the issue is not content but owning the hardware platform and delivery of content? Just as the US carriers has a lockdown on the Premium SMS through their phones and networks, Apple and Amazon is doing the same thing with their mobile devices. 

Here is my prediction - content providers are going to finally get a clue after getting played by Apple/Amazon and realize they need to own the mobile device they distributing content. Barnes and Noble and Sony is now figuring this out also. 

So expect these mobile e-readers to adopt to the cell phone model of being offered for free and the focus is more on content purchases. This is my prediction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Miller said &lt;i&gt;&quot;People are willing to pay for Kindle. For example, I pay for my Journal on the Kindle..&lt;/i&gt;</p>
<p>So he doesn&#39;t get an employee discount? The mobile premium SMS/WAP push industry already established this science years ago, can&#39;t we agree?  </p>
<p>With that said, can&#39;t we also argue the issue is not content but owning the hardware platform and delivery of content? Just as the US carriers has a lockdown on the Premium SMS through their phones and networks, Apple and Amazon is doing the same thing with their mobile devices. </p>
<p>Here is my prediction &#8211; content providers are going to finally get a clue after getting played by Apple/Amazon and realize they need to own the mobile device they distributing content. Barnes and Noble and Sony is now figuring this out also. </p>
<p>So expect these mobile e-readers to adopt to the cell phone model of being offered for free and the focus is more on content purchases. This is my prediction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
