<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Counters Microsoft With New Features, Including Real-Time Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShyamKapur</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShyamKapur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a bold, timely move by Google that is likely to lead to a massive shake up in the entire search industry.  It is clear that some of the folks who have commented so far are not very excited about it. I can understand this, too. I&#039;d recommend folks check out TipTop at http://FeelTipTop.com to see what &quot;real&quot; real-time search can deliver when packaged well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bold, timely move by Google that is likely to lead to a massive shake up in the entire search industry.  It is clear that some of the folks who have commented so far are not very excited about it. I can understand this, too. I&#8217;d recommend folks check out TipTop at <a href="http://FeelTipTop.com" rel="nofollow">http://FeelTipTop.com</a> to see what &#8220;real&#8221; real-time search can deliver when packaged well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s gonna be a search engine war. Can’t wait to see more updates from google.Expecting new year gifts from Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s gonna be a search engine war. Can’t wait to see more updates from google.Expecting new year gifts from Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bingoogle</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bingoogle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why read ordinary people saying about Taylor Swift on Twitter? Why not read her tweets? Quite annoying to read those.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why read ordinary people saying about Taylor Swift on Twitter? Why not read her tweets? Quite annoying to read those&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wayne</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fred wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great, now i can see when gmail outages occur in real-time]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great, now i can see when gmail outages occur in real-time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunn</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Dunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2009/12/08/419-google-counters-microsoft-with-new-search-features/#comment-75626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see little or nothing innovative and surprised at the &quot;in the works&quot; discussion that is given a pass by the press. 

Real-time search is nothing more than agent-based technology. I don&#039;t believe general consumers care about real-time search and the audience that will use real-time search are using more hard-core agent tools for agent-based information retrieval. But the &quot;real time search&quot; moniker is cute and faddy, though....

Voice command search was implemented by Microsoft Live Mobile, prior to Bing several years ago. What was describe was very similiar to what Microsoft released years ago with their SAPI and it appears to be catch-up. The issue with voice command is the similiar to Ask Jeeves poor implementation of natural language query processing - it appears to be nothing but a facade and not a true platform to accomdate voice/conservant information retrieval.

Overall, I expected something more fundamentally groundbreaking than this stuff... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see little or nothing innovative and surprised at the &#8220;in the works&#8221; discussion that is given a pass by the press. </p>
<p>Real-time search is nothing more than agent-based technology. I don&#8217;t believe general consumers care about real-time search and the audience that will use real-time search are using more hard-core agent tools for agent-based information retrieval. But the &#8220;real time search&#8221; moniker is cute and faddy, though&#8230;.</p>
<p>Voice command search was implemented by Microsoft Live Mobile, prior to Bing several years ago. What was describe was very similiar to what Microsoft released years ago with their SAPI and it appears to be catch-up. The issue with voice command is the similiar to Ask Jeeves poor implementation of natural language query processing &#8211; it appears to be nothing but a facade and not a true platform to accomdate voice/conservant information retrieval.</p>
<p>Overall, I expected something more fundamentally groundbreaking than this stuff&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
