<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glam Raises $50 Million Mezzanine Round at $750 Million Valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanna</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ok folks, this is a simple as, &quot;hey if we keep hinting at an IPO, someone might buy us&quot;.  &quot;Hope it happens before we blow our dough.&quot;  Sham Media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok folks, this is a simple as, &#8220;hey if we keep hinting at an IPO, someone might buy us&#8221;.  &#8220;Hope it happens before we blow our dough.&#8221;  Sham Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jenkins, Good point, you are correct -- was only looking at valuation and total raised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jenkins, Good point, you are correct &#8212; was only looking at valuation and total raised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it&#039;s better to stay private if you don&#039;t have the numbers but I am not sure how you know they only suffered tiny dilution. There may have been warrants given or other preferences given that make the actual dilution look higher. They may have also had to increase the employee option pool and so many other things could affect ownership. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s better to stay private if you don&#8217;t have the numbers but I am not sure how you know they only suffered tiny dilution. There may have been warrants given or other preferences given that make the actual dilution look higher. They may have also had to increase the employee option pool and so many other things could affect ownership. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much better to do a round and remain private- specially given the valuation and the tiny dilution raising $50M is for them. Gives them time to build the company to a bigger better public company in the future. Facebook, Glam, Zynga all taking capital and waiting to do a bigger IPO&#039;s in the future. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better to do a round and remain private- specially given the valuation and the tiny dilution raising $50M is for them. Gives them time to build the company to a bigger better public company in the future. Facebook, Glam, Zynga all taking capital and waiting to do a bigger IPO&#8217;s in the future. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/02/03/419-glam-raises-50-million-mezzanine-round-at-750-million-valuation/#comment-76751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s cut through the spin, folks. No one has the choice between a successful IPO and raising money. This is one of those inside jokes, ya know? Let me briefly explain:

If you think you can really truly get investors excited enough to buy your story and buy your stock, you will do it. This also means that you have supreme confidence that you can continue to grow and beat your numbers over the following 18 months or so.

If you are not very sure of this then you take money because the IPO route wasn&#039;t really available to you. You then go out and tell people that you thought long and hard, but eventually decided to dilute the heck out of the company instead!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s cut through the spin, folks. No one has the choice between a successful IPO and raising money. This is one of those inside jokes, ya know? Let me briefly explain:</p>
<p>If you think you can really truly get investors excited enough to buy your story and buy your stock, you will do it. This also means that you have supreme confidence that you can continue to grow and beat your numbers over the following 18 months or so.</p>
<p>If you are not very sure of this then you take money because the IPO route wasn&#8217;t really available to you. You then go out and tell people that you thought long and hard, but eventually decided to dilute the heck out of the company instead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
