<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Questions Can We Expect To Be Answered In Demand&#8217;s S-1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you like Demand&#039;s business, it&#039;s still a business that throws off cash.  They owe their &#039;success&#039; to AdSense, and if this didn&#039;t exist, neither would Demand.  I would just hope that future potential suckers (investors) are smart enough to look past the current numbers and look closely at Rosenblatt&#039;s actual track record of building companies with some staying power.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you like Demand&#8217;s business, it&#8217;s still a business that throws off cash.  They owe their &#8216;success&#8217; to AdSense, and if this didn&#8217;t exist, neither would Demand.  I would just hope that future potential suckers (investors) are smart enough to look past the current numbers and look closely at Rosenblatt&#8217;s actual track record of building companies with some staying power.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunn</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Dunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand the application of the word &quot;controversial&quot; in this article. When I hear the word &quot;controversial&quot; used, I would like to know the two opposing issues and moral center of the writer to get a better perspective. Most people use the world &quot;controversial&quot; for sensational purposes. 

I don&#039;t know much about Demand Media but the model appears to be the same and is unfortunate. Whenever you try to &quot;centralized&quot; a service, you can be zero-summed by decentralized efforts that can do a better job.

Encyclopedia Brittancia was &quot;centralized&quot; while Wikipedia was decentralized and has a lower zero sum as a non-profit. This is the first thing that comes to mind when I read about Demand Media. 

Again, investors and the money they throw around does not carry merits or can override the competitive landscape and challenges in this industry...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the application of the word &#8220;controversial&#8221; in this article. When I hear the word &#8220;controversial&#8221; used, I would like to know the two opposing issues and moral center of the writer to get a better perspective. Most people use the world &#8220;controversial&#8221; for sensational purposes. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Demand Media but the model appears to be the same and is unfortunate. Whenever you try to &#8220;centralized&#8221; a service, you can be zero-summed by decentralized efforts that can do a better job.</p>
<p>Encyclopedia Brittancia was &#8220;centralized&#8221; while Wikipedia was decentralized and has a lower zero sum as a non-profit. This is the first thing that comes to mind when I read about Demand Media. </p>
<p>Again, investors and the money they throw around does not carry merits or can override the competitive landscape and challenges in this industry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steved</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steved]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/04/16/419-what-questions-can-we-expect-answered-in-demands-s-1/#comment-78107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much of their revenue comes from porn/adult and typo trademark domains. These are highly lucrative, and well hidden. Will the lawyers make them come clean? Will Goldman really underwrite a company with these kind of liabilities?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of their revenue comes from porn/adult and typo trademark domains. These are highly lucrative, and well hidden. Will the lawyers make them come clean? Will Goldman really underwrite a company with these kind of liabilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
