<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Google Paid Content System For Publishers May Be Coming By Year-End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[concerned]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publishers have to be wary of putting all their eggs in the Google basket.  This is not another &quot;lest they get too big&quot; argument, but rather one about risk management.

Google has often been charged with being responsible for demolishing the business models of traditional publishing. Online, publishers are now dependent on Google&#039;s independent algorithmic decisions for their traffic, meaning that their Display and Adsense revenue streams are now directly affected by Google&#039;s algorithms. Any algorithmic twitch by Google today percolates across the entire publishing eco-system, leaving site managers scrambling for ways to recover their lost revenues each time a detrimental change is made.  With Adsense, major publishers are now finding that Google is responsible for more than half their advertising revenues. By going with Google&#039;s paywall system, publishers will be letting Google in on one of their last remaining revenue streams - Subscription Revenues, at a 30% premium, with Google potentially holding the reins on how publishers price their content (at least on the micropayments side) as well.

The choice of a paywall solution cannot be a pure technology consideration.  When evaluating revenue streams through paid/metered/subscription access solutions, publishers have to evaluate the risk landscape carefully, and ensure that revenue risks are well hedged through diversification of their revenue sources.  

Newspass may be a big story for Google, but I am not sure this is something for publishers to rush into.  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishers have to be wary of putting all their eggs in the Google basket.  This is not another &#8220;lest they get too big&#8221; argument, but rather one about risk management.</p>
<p>Google has often been charged with being responsible for demolishing the business models of traditional publishing. Online, publishers are now dependent on Google&#8217;s independent algorithmic decisions for their traffic, meaning that their Display and Adsense revenue streams are now directly affected by Google&#8217;s algorithms. Any algorithmic twitch by Google today percolates across the entire publishing eco-system, leaving site managers scrambling for ways to recover their lost revenues each time a detrimental change is made.  With Adsense, major publishers are now finding that Google is responsible for more than half their advertising revenues. By going with Google&#8217;s paywall system, publishers will be letting Google in on one of their last remaining revenue streams &#8211; Subscription Revenues, at a 30% premium, with Google potentially holding the reins on how publishers price their content (at least on the micropayments side) as well.</p>
<p>The choice of a paywall solution cannot be a pure technology consideration.  When evaluating revenue streams through paid/metered/subscription access solutions, publishers have to evaluate the risk landscape carefully, and ensure that revenue risks are well hedged through diversification of their revenue sources.  </p>
<p>Newspass may be a big story for Google, but I am not sure this is something for publishers to rush into.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a terrible idea for Google and for its users. The only people who win with this are dinosaur newspaper publishers. I would not use Google if I knew that any more than one of the top ten organic results was behind a pay wall. Newspass would seem to be a great thing for competing search engines if their content remains free. At the very least, the paid results should be segregated from the organic results, similar to the way AdWords ads are segregated now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a terrible idea for Google and for its users. The only people who win with this are dinosaur newspaper publishers. I would not use Google if I knew that any more than one of the top ten organic results was behind a pay wall. Newspass would seem to be a great thing for competing search engines if their content remains free. At the very least, the paid results should be segregated from the organic results, similar to the way AdWords ads are segregated now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qwerty9876</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qwerty9876]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But obviously you do enjoy reading and talking about them Norman]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But obviously you do enjoy reading and talking about them Norman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love google]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company will use the proceeds to build out its platform. Two-year-old Magnetic, which was previously known for contextual ad serving as DomDex before changing its name.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company will use the proceeds to build out its platform. Two-year-old Magnetic, which was previously known for contextual ad serving as DomDex before changing its name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Rogers</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/06/18/419-google-reportedly-launching-a-paid-content-system-for-italian-publisher/#comment-79178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I rather like the idea of exposing the how and why of this sort of thing. Anything that kills newspapers is fine by me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather like the idea of exposing the how and why of this sort of thing. Anything that kills newspapers is fine by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
