<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search Compromise Earns China License Renewal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 66</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/#comment-79504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[66]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/#comment-79504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Klein, S. Wolf, Laura G. Militellio, and Carolyn E.Zsambok show that skilled decisionmakers usually generate a good COA [course of action] on their first try. J.G. Johnson and M. Raab replicated this finding, extending it to show that when skilled decisionmakers abandon their initial COA in favor of a later one, the subsequent COA’s quality is significantly lower than the first one.&quot; 

Compromised quality and big trouble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Klein, S. Wolf, Laura G. Militellio, and Carolyn E.Zsambok show that skilled decisionmakers usually generate a good COA [course of action] on their first try. J.G. Johnson and M. Raab replicated this finding, extending it to show that when skilled decisionmakers abandon their initial COA in favor of a later one, the subsequent COA’s quality is significantly lower than the first one.&#8221; </p>
<p>Compromised quality and big trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/#comment-79503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Look]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/07/09/419-google-search-compromise-earns-china-license-renewal/#comment-79503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google, we&#039;re EVIL!

i can just imagine the headline if this was Apple = 

*Apple lied to us..caved in to EVIL pressure!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google, we&#8217;re EVIL!</p>
<p>i can just imagine the headline if this was Apple = </p>
<p>*Apple lied to us..caved in to EVIL pressure!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
