<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ&#8217;s Thomson Sets Up Special Project Team &#8216;Crucial&#8217; To Company&#8217;s Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/09/15/419-wsjs-thomson-sets-up-special-project-team-crucial-to-companys-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/09/15/419-wsjs-thomson-sets-up-special-project-team-crucial-to-companys-success/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/09/15/419-wsjs-thomson-sets-up-special-project-team-crucial-to-companys-success/#comment-80179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/09/15/419-wsjs-thomson-sets-up-special-project-team-crucial-to-companys-success/#comment-80179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Journal’s previously strong business filter/focus...&quot;

Let&#039;s just call a spade a spade. Instead of taking a logical step towards more in-depth business reporting, the WSJ focused instead on right-wing emotional &quot;shock media&quot; commentary and diluted their brand and credibility. 

This is their so-called &quot;problem&quot; because it is apparent the WSJ realized the right-wing angle is as shallow as a weekly tabloid and they lost their base. 

The moral of the story is this - don&#039;t ever try to play the zero sum game theory unless you fully know and ready to deal with the ones who are near zero. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Journal’s previously strong business filter/focus&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just call a spade a spade. Instead of taking a logical step towards more in-depth business reporting, the WSJ focused instead on right-wing emotional &#8220;shock media&#8221; commentary and diluted their brand and credibility. </p>
<p>This is their so-called &#8220;problem&#8221; because it is apparent the WSJ realized the right-wing angle is as shallow as a weekly tabloid and they lost their base. </p>
<p>The moral of the story is this &#8211; don&#8217;t ever try to play the zero sum game theory unless you fully know and ready to deal with the ones who are near zero. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
