http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/13/419-conde-nast-study-concludes-ipad-is-not-a-mobile-device-at-least-not-now/ The economics of digital content Mon, 20 May 2013 15:40:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/13/419-conde-nast-study-concludes-ipad-is-not-a-mobile-device-at-least-not-now/#comment-80485 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:42:36 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/13/419-conde-nast-study-concludes-ipad-is-not-a-mobile-device-at-least-not-now/#comment-80485 “In other words, once someone has two or more app issues downloaded, Condé Nast was unable to tell which issue they are looking at because Apple does not provide that level of detail. ” Really? How about killing two birds with one stone by having issues as in-app purchase instead of this insane one-app-per-issue policy? It’s probably easier to monitor views within apps (actually, I can’t see why you can’t send view information from individual apps either. What gives?) I’ll probably NEVER buy any of the issue to clutter my already crowded menu icons and folders with this silly purchase model.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/13/419-conde-nast-study-concludes-ipad-is-not-a-mobile-device-at-least-not-now/#comment-80484 Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:59:23 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/13/419-conde-nast-study-concludes-ipad-is-not-a-mobile-device-at-least-not-now/#comment-80484 I can give you one reason why I don’t read this publications on my iPad. I already have a subscription to the print versions. So until those subscriptions start running out or when Conde Naste offers a way to convert – I will simply not buy the issue on my iPad – which goes with me everywhere.

]]>