<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Google TV Could Hand Netflix The Entire Streaming Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer homes</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jennifer homes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google TV is the next generation of watching tv online.. Read more from here
http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-tv-readies-for-launch-deals-with-hbo-turner-nba-cnbc-etc/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google TV is the next generation of watching tv online.. Read more from here<br />
<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-tv-readies-for-launch-deals-with-hbo-turner-nba-cnbc-etc/" rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-tv-readies-for-launch-deals-with-hbo-turner-nba-cnbc-etc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ference</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ference]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers are just asking for the same content that is available via the PC to be accessed through these conected devices. Secondly I would trade paying for extra gigs delivered, than 300 bucks a month for crap I don&#039;t watch. I&#039;ll pay for what I consume thank you. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers are just asking for the same content that is available via the PC to be accessed through these conected devices. Secondly I would trade paying for extra gigs delivered, than 300 bucks a month for crap I don&#8217;t watch. I&#8217;ll pay for what I consume thank you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob okane</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob okane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike Google and Netflix, Funn Networks brings a new business model to the game, paying content providers more money than any other servive such as Netflix, Google Tv, You Tube and the countless others who failed in the past such as Pressplay, Musicnet and many others....  On avergae, Funn would pay 100-200% more than content owners are currently recieving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike Google and Netflix, Funn Networks brings a new business model to the game, paying content providers more money than any other servive such as Netflix, Google Tv, You Tube and the countless others who failed in the past such as Pressplay, Musicnet and many others&#8230;.  On avergae, Funn would pay 100-200% more than content owners are currently recieving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob okane</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob okane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, your right on cue and this makes total sense... Funn Networks would like to speak to you. Yes, we&#039;re the one&#039;s who will correct both Netflix and Google Tv.. We&#039;ve been preparing for ten years and have waited patiently for the world to evolve to where it is today.. bob@funnonline.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, your right on cue and this makes total sense&#8230; Funn Networks would like to speak to you. Yes, we&#8217;re the one&#8217;s who will correct both Netflix and Google Tv.. We&#8217;ve been preparing for ten years and have waited patiently for the world to evolve to where it is today.. <a href="mailto:bob@funnonline.net">bob@funnonline.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joby Elliott</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joby Elliott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trouble with your argument is the assumption that content streaming is measured solely by bandwidth consumed as a percentage of the total.

Everyone in the world does not want to stream TV at once during prime time.

Another streaming service&#039;s growth will almost certainly be at the expense of Netflix and the other entrenched players.

Never mind the fact that you&#039;ve totally missed the mark on what Google TV actually DOES. Sorry Mark, but you&#039;ve got this one completely, moronically, wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble with your argument is the assumption that content streaming is measured solely by bandwidth consumed as a percentage of the total.</p>
<p>Everyone in the world does not want to stream TV at once during prime time.</p>
<p>Another streaming service&#8217;s growth will almost certainly be at the expense of Netflix and the other entrenched players.</p>
<p>Never mind the fact that you&#8217;ve totally missed the mark on what Google TV actually DOES. Sorry Mark, but you&#8217;ve got this one completely, moronically, wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvenrunelord</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elvenrunelord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think many of you have forgotten why these streaming services were created to begin with.
These services are a natural backlash against piracy in an attempt to gain back people willing to pay for content if it is easy enough to do so and offered in a manner the consumer wants.

Streaming goes away, pirating will increase on a scale that has never been seen before. Streaming services from other countries offering content to people who will pay them for it.
This nonsense needs to stop. As far as the price of internet going up..........marginal at best. Any smart company would have been building bandwidth over time as it was clear that this day was coming. If said companies decided to take profits at the expense of maintaining and expanding their networks, well they will lose both customers and profit to those who were smart enough to do so. I know I am not willing to pay anymore for internet access and in fact think the price is beyond reason right now.

Businesses need to start thinking about social responsibility before they start thinking about profit. trust me, if the productive capacity is there, the profit is there. No need to worry about that.

Another big issue here that no one in the media industry seems to be considering is that you have way more competition than you used to for eyeballs. I as a consumer can play MMO&#039;s for about $15 a month. Get involved in my community for next to nothing. Read over 1,000,000 ebooks and counting for nothing.

Why in the hell do you think I would pay you MORE for your somewhat dubious video content?

You people need to wake up and notice the herd of new content producers who are not only capable of competing with you, they are going to come along and gather up your eyeballs and carry them away if you don&#039;t provide something similar to what they are. Many of these new content providers are only doing it for personal enjoyment and or a simple living, thus offer it for nothing, or very cheap. If are unwilling to compete against them you are going to FAIL on an epic level.

Consumers are going to have to learn that nothing is for free? What a laugh. I can watch youtube videos until I die and never run out. I can read free ebooks until I die and never run out.

Businesses are going to have to learn to survive on the all you can consumer model or they will be marginalized to the point of bankruptcy. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of you have forgotten why these streaming services were created to begin with.<br />
These services are a natural backlash against piracy in an attempt to gain back people willing to pay for content if it is easy enough to do so and offered in a manner the consumer wants.</p>
<p>Streaming goes away, pirating will increase on a scale that has never been seen before. Streaming services from other countries offering content to people who will pay them for it.<br />
This nonsense needs to stop. As far as the price of internet going up&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.marginal at best. Any smart company would have been building bandwidth over time as it was clear that this day was coming. If said companies decided to take profits at the expense of maintaining and expanding their networks, well they will lose both customers and profit to those who were smart enough to do so. I know I am not willing to pay anymore for internet access and in fact think the price is beyond reason right now.</p>
<p>Businesses need to start thinking about social responsibility before they start thinking about profit. trust me, if the productive capacity is there, the profit is there. No need to worry about that.</p>
<p>Another big issue here that no one in the media industry seems to be considering is that you have way more competition than you used to for eyeballs. I as a consumer can play MMO&#8217;s for about $15 a month. Get involved in my community for next to nothing. Read over 1,000,000 ebooks and counting for nothing.</p>
<p>Why in the hell do you think I would pay you MORE for your somewhat dubious video content?</p>
<p>You people need to wake up and notice the herd of new content producers who are not only capable of competing with you, they are going to come along and gather up your eyeballs and carry them away if you don&#8217;t provide something similar to what they are. Many of these new content providers are only doing it for personal enjoyment and or a simple living, thus offer it for nothing, or very cheap. If are unwilling to compete against them you are going to FAIL on an epic level.</p>
<p>Consumers are going to have to learn that nothing is for free? What a laugh. I can watch youtube videos until I die and never run out. I can read free ebooks until I die and never run out.</p>
<p>Businesses are going to have to learn to survive on the all you can consumer model or they will be marginalized to the point of bankruptcy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Mark Cuban gets the internet at all. Google TV is not a content server, it merely is a search engine that finds web pages (like the network web pages themselves) and lets you play content found through a web browser. No Mark Cuban, you are stupid]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Mark Cuban gets the internet at all. Google TV is not a content server, it merely is a search engine that finds web pages (like the network web pages themselves) and lets you play content found through a web browser. No Mark Cuban, you are stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Warman Kern</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Warman Kern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent &quot;Future of Media&quot; forum, the only thing the panel could agree on is that 95% of all content on all media sucks.  Figuring out how to distribute the junk on more screens and proving that nobody is watching with ad targeting and tracking technology is not a gamechanger. 

If Google or other technologists wants to contribute to changing the game, there are two things that need to happen:

Technologists must partner with someone who owns all the rights to a live event, like Mark Cuban or Comradity, to prove that there is exponentially incremental revenue from integrating high production value video and audience participation.  Until there is proof that there is a business reason to integrate live video transmission and interactive applications, these dimensions of entertainment and information will be separate and distinct.

Develop a platform for sharing and discovery which both respects the right of individuals to control the info they share and makes it easier to discover the quality in the long tail. This is what Google promised to do.  But we ended up with a system designed to usurp individual control over the info shared to enable 3rd parties to &quot;game&quot; the system so Google could make money.  I have no idea why they aren&#039;t using all that cash to figure out how to do what they promised to deliver in the first place.

Mark is right. It is stupid to treat the 5% of the content that people and sponsors will pay huge premiums to participate in like the junk people will not pay for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a recent &#8220;Future of Media&#8221; forum, the only thing the panel could agree on is that 95% of all content on all media sucks.  Figuring out how to distribute the junk on more screens and proving that nobody is watching with ad targeting and tracking technology is not a gamechanger. </p>
<p>If Google or other technologists wants to contribute to changing the game, there are two things that need to happen:</p>
<p>Technologists must partner with someone who owns all the rights to a live event, like Mark Cuban or Comradity, to prove that there is exponentially incremental revenue from integrating high production value video and audience participation.  Until there is proof that there is a business reason to integrate live video transmission and interactive applications, these dimensions of entertainment and information will be separate and distinct.</p>
<p>Develop a platform for sharing and discovery which both respects the right of individuals to control the info they share and makes it easier to discover the quality in the long tail. This is what Google promised to do.  But we ended up with a system designed to usurp individual control over the info shared to enable 3rd parties to &#8220;game&#8221; the system so Google could make money.  I have no idea why they aren&#8217;t using all that cash to figure out how to do what they promised to deliver in the first place.</p>
<p>Mark is right. It is stupid to treat the 5% of the content that people and sponsors will pay huge premiums to participate in like the junk people will not pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[invitedmedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks staci, i&#039;m aware of mark cuban&#039;s other holdings.

my point was i didn&#039;t want to go as far as dan (two commenters above me), but cuban&#039;s argument about bandwidth fails because it extrapolates netflix&#039;s future bandwidth needs &quot;to rule&quot; the streaming universe while assuming that same bandwidth remains a constant.

not gonna happen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks staci, i&#8217;m aware of mark cuban&#8217;s other holdings.</p>
<p>my point was i didn&#8217;t want to go as far as dan (two commenters above me), but cuban&#8217;s argument about bandwidth fails because it extrapolates netflix&#8217;s future bandwidth needs &#8220;to rule&#8221; the streaming universe while assuming that same bandwidth remains a constant.</p>
<p>not gonna happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staci D. Kramer</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staci D. Kramer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/23/419-how-google-tv-could-hand-netflix-the-entire-streaming-universe/#comment-80639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We probably should have included this in the fine print. In addition
to the Mavericks and other assets, Mark Cuban also owns 2929
Entertainment with Todd Wagner. Holdings include cable nets
HDNet/HDNet Movies, Landmark Theaters, film distributor Magnolia
Pictures and a stake in Lions Gate .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We probably should have included this in the fine print. In addition<br />
to the Mavericks and other assets, Mark Cuban also owns 2929<br />
Entertainment with Todd Wagner. Holdings include cable nets<br />
HDNet/HDNet Movies, Landmark Theaters, film distributor Magnolia<br />
Pictures and a stake in Lions Gate .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
