<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Cable To Test Cheaper TV Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heilager</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heilager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would jump on this except for one thing.....no HD.

HD is industry standard now, not a luxury. Advertisers should be concerned that TWC is pushing our inferior copies of their ads to consumers who are pushed by necessity to spend the majority of their income on consumables. Advertisers have always wanted their ads to look as good as possible and this strategy fails them. The HD signal costs no more to push than the standard signal.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would jump on this except for one thing&#8230;..no HD.</p>
<p>HD is industry standard now, not a luxury. Advertisers should be concerned that TWC is pushing our inferior copies of their ads to consumers who are pushed by necessity to spend the majority of their income on consumables. Advertisers have always wanted their ads to look as good as possible and this strategy fails them. The HD signal costs no more to push than the standard signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Richmond</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Richmond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISH Network has your favorite Vicom channels like comedy central even on our basic packages plus we offer them in HD! DISH Network also carries ESPN in HD on there basic programming packages and it is free thanks to there HD free for life promotion. Being a DISH employee I know DISH is the best in DVR technology and our DVR&#039;s have the largest hard drive in the industry and has a 30-second skip capability. DISH Network has the lowest all digital prices around with twice as many choices. Check this out www.dish.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISH Network has your favorite Vicom channels like comedy central even on our basic packages plus we offer them in HD! DISH Network also carries ESPN in HD on there basic programming packages and it is free thanks to there HD free for life promotion. Being a DISH employee I know DISH is the best in DVR technology and our DVR&#8217;s have the largest hard drive in the industry and has a 30-second skip capability. DISH Network has the lowest all digital prices around with twice as many choices. Check this out <a href="http://www.dish.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dish.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/11/19/419-time-warner-cable-to-test-cheaper-tv-package/#comment-81035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In many states (at least NY) there is a regulation that says the cable companies have to provide &quot;reception cable&quot; at a low cost $10-$11 a month.  It has all of the broadcast channels plus 10-15 throw-in channels. The cable company will deny that they have it, but if you go in to complain they will give it to you. This sounds like the same thing, but at a 300% mark-up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many states (at least NY) there is a regulation that says the cable companies have to provide &#8220;reception cable&#8221; at a low cost $10-$11 a month.  It has all of the broadcast channels plus 10-15 throw-in channels. The cable company will deny that they have it, but if you go in to complain they will give it to you. This sounds like the same thing, but at a 300% mark-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
