<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turner Chief Explains How TV Industry Will Neutralize Netflix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael S</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything Bewkes says right now is just talk.  He&#039;s been evangelizing &quot;TV Everywhere&quot; for some 18 odd months now and I have yet to see a viable competitor to DISH Network&#039;s TV Everywhere platform that has already been brought to market.  I can tell you as a DISH employee and customer that I take comfort in the fact that the company I subscribe to (and work for) has put out a better, reliable solution for watching live TV and DVR recordings on a myriad of different devices (smartphones, laptops, tablets).  I can also say, as a customer, that I enjoy using my Galaxy S phone to access that content during my down time.  The convenience factor is simply amazing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything Bewkes says right now is just talk.  He&#8217;s been evangelizing &#8220;TV Everywhere&#8221; for some 18 odd months now and I have yet to see a viable competitor to DISH Network&#8217;s TV Everywhere platform that has already been brought to market.  I can tell you as a DISH employee and customer that I take comfort in the fact that the company I subscribe to (and work for) has put out a better, reliable solution for watching live TV and DVR recordings on a myriad of different devices (smartphones, laptops, tablets).  I can also say, as a customer, that I enjoy using my Galaxy S phone to access that content during my down time.  The convenience factor is simply amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see why you people have so much trouble with what this guy is saying.

He&#039;s only gonna pay for shows that you can&#039;t watch elsewhere.

Why should I pay top dollar for reruns of Mismatch, when people can see em on another network?  I&#039;ll pay top dollar if they can ONLY be seen on my network.

And Netflix is another network.

No collusion here, this is bizness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why you people have so much trouble with what this guy is saying.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s only gonna pay for shows that you can&#8217;t watch elsewhere.</p>
<p>Why should I pay top dollar for reruns of Mismatch, when people can see em on another network?  I&#8217;ll pay top dollar if they can ONLY be seen on my network.</p>
<p>And Netflix is another network.</p>
<p>No collusion here, this is bizness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason K</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“We tell our suppliers, the studios we buy from: This is going to have a significant impact on what we’ll be willing to pay for programming or even bid at all.”

Tough talk for a guy who himself is getting his seat at the table knocked right out from under him.  Guess what?  In the end, the people decide.  The people are favoring services like Netflix and no longer want to watch normal television. 

 Broadcasting companies and cable companies are going to have to take a haircut eventually.  I suspect some will go away all together.

And by the way, regarding the post made by &quot;Smartesse&quot; - what planet did you come from?  Spend 5 seconds on Google Finance and prove yourself wrong.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We tell our suppliers, the studios we buy from: This is going to have a significant impact on what we’ll be willing to pay for programming or even bid at all.”</p>
<p>Tough talk for a guy who himself is getting his seat at the table knocked right out from under him.  Guess what?  In the end, the people decide.  The people are favoring services like Netflix and no longer want to watch normal television. </p>
<p> Broadcasting companies and cable companies are going to have to take a haircut eventually.  I suspect some will go away all together.</p>
<p>And by the way, regarding the post made by &#8220;Smartesse&#8221; &#8211; what planet did you come from?  Spend 5 seconds on Google Finance and prove yourself wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Deans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the &quot;restraint of trade&quot; issue -- is it possible that the USDOJ Antitrust division would open a review -- based upon Kent&#039;s comments?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the &#8220;restraint of trade&#8221; issue &#8212; is it possible that the USDOJ Antitrust division would open a review &#8212; based upon Kent&#8217;s comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankz00</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frankz00]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAHAHAHAHA!!! Go ahead and &quot;neutralize&quot; NetFlix if you want.... All that means is that you&#039;re going to get the hell pirated out of your content.  Consolidation is king, baby!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHAHA!!! Go ahead and &#8220;neutralize&#8221; NetFlix if you want&#8230;. All that means is that you&#8217;re going to get the hell pirated out of your content.  Consolidation is king, baby!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Donatello</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Donatello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Superficially, at least, it sounds like Kent is advocating the same closed, defensive approach to emerging markets that the newspaper industry adopted 13 years ago. I bet it will get him the same results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superficially, at least, it sounds like Kent is advocating the same closed, defensive approach to emerging markets that the newspaper industry adopted 13 years ago. I bet it will get him the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[invitedmedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mr. feldman,

first thing i thought too.

but let them collude. just look what the newspapers did with the much-balleyhooed journalismonline (now press+) to see how that&#039;ll work when you get them all into one room.

herding cats will look like child&#039;s play]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. feldman,</p>
<p>first thing i thought too.</p>
<p>but let them collude. just look what the newspapers did with the much-balleyhooed journalismonline (now press+) to see how that&#8217;ll work when you get them all into one room.</p>
<p>herding cats will look like child&#8217;s play</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Feldman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Len Feldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it amazing that Mr. Kent effectively admitted that the cable networks have formed an illegal cartel to deny rights to their content to Netflix. I thought that Jeff Bewkes was out of touch with reality, but that&#039;s nothing compared to admitting being a part of illegal restraint of trade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amazing that Mr. Kent effectively admitted that the cable networks have formed an illegal cartel to deny rights to their content to Netflix. I thought that Jeff Bewkes was out of touch with reality, but that&#8217;s nothing compared to admitting being a part of illegal restraint of trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well written David!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Polakoff</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Polakoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/06/419-turner-chief-explains-how-tv-industry-will-neutralize-netflix/#comment-81596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all due respect to my fellow Lehigh University alumnus, Mr. Kent (and I do have great respect for him):

The traditional business model still feeds channel programmers and channel distributors with tons of cash, so both camps will continue to prop up the levee as long as possible.  But with the DVD cash cow already starting to run dry, other elements of the traditional model will also soon be impacted.  The tipping point for legacy businesses moving to new business models, which retain existing customers and attract new ones, and which generate sufficient revenue streams, is the Holy Grail.  This is a huge challenge for mature stage companies, but it is critical for survival and they have to move, lest they travel to the cliff’s edge, as print and music have done. Consumers have decades of frustration and disdain for cable companies, so they’ll jump ship at the first opportunity. Channel programmers, whose bread and butter are affiliate revenue (advertising revenue, withstanding) will irk the ire of their consumer/fan base if programming content can’t be accessed however the consumer demands.  Hence, the broadcast/cable channels slowly making more programming available off the traditional distribution pipes. This process will continue and not ease.  Starving these outlets for content will eventually prove futile.

PS - In another Paid Content post of today, read how the NBA/Turner may be on the &quot;cutting edge,&quot; &quot;The NBA’s latest push for ubiquity and digital revenue could allow fans to bypass pay TV operators for access to live games.&quot;

http://paidcontent.org/article/419-ces-nba-digital-expanda-to-more-connected-tvs-and-adds-premium-live-gam/

David Polakoff

“The Winter of Our Content Distribution Discontent”
http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to my fellow Lehigh University alumnus, Mr. Kent (and I do have great respect for him):</p>
<p>The traditional business model still feeds channel programmers and channel distributors with tons of cash, so both camps will continue to prop up the levee as long as possible.  But with the DVD cash cow already starting to run dry, other elements of the traditional model will also soon be impacted.  The tipping point for legacy businesses moving to new business models, which retain existing customers and attract new ones, and which generate sufficient revenue streams, is the Holy Grail.  This is a huge challenge for mature stage companies, but it is critical for survival and they have to move, lest they travel to the cliff’s edge, as print and music have done. Consumers have decades of frustration and disdain for cable companies, so they’ll jump ship at the first opportunity. Channel programmers, whose bread and butter are affiliate revenue (advertising revenue, withstanding) will irk the ire of their consumer/fan base if programming content can’t be accessed however the consumer demands.  Hence, the broadcast/cable channels slowly making more programming available off the traditional distribution pipes. This process will continue and not ease.  Starving these outlets for content will eventually prove futile.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; In another Paid Content post of today, read how the NBA/Turner may be on the &#8220;cutting edge,&#8221; &#8220;The NBA’s latest push for ubiquity and digital revenue could allow fans to bypass pay TV operators for access to live games.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-ces-nba-digital-expanda-to-more-connected-tvs-and-adds-premium-live-gam/" rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-ces-nba-digital-expanda-to-more-connected-tvs-and-adds-premium-live-gam/</a></p>
<p>David Polakoff</p>
<p>“The Winter of Our Content Distribution Discontent”<br />
<a href="http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
