<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After 200 Lawsuits Against Sites, Righthaven Targets Online Commenters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faust</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can&#039;t we just give credits and urls posted from the source of articles? i think that will help in promoting each other site/s as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t we just give credits and urls posted from the source of articles? i think that will help in promoting each other site/s as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mullin</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Mullin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark H, thanks for your comment. In many—probably most—Righthaven lawsuits, credit is given and often a link-back is given to the original source. I only say &quot;probably&quot; I can&#039;t be 100% sure -- the company has filed more than 200 lawsuits and I&#039;ve personally read only about two dozen of those. 

Giving proper credit is considered ethically important on the internet, but it doesn&#039;t protect one from a copyright claim at all. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark H, thanks for your comment. In many—probably most—Righthaven lawsuits, credit is given and often a link-back is given to the original source. I only say &#8220;probably&#8221; I can&#8217;t be 100% sure &#8212; the company has filed more than 200 lawsuits and I&#8217;ve personally read only about two dozen of those. </p>
<p>Giving proper credit is considered ethically important on the internet, but it doesn&#8217;t protect one from a copyright claim at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Handelman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Handelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/19/419-after-200-lawsuits-against-sites-righthaven-targets-online-commenters/#comment-81890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that they are concerned with people copy and pasting news articles, whether from a free site or behind a paywall. To Righthaven, does it matter whether or not the source URL and byline are included?

I wonder in some cases if this is about properly recognizing the written work, or the advertisers that cover the rest of the article&#039;s page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that they are concerned with people copy and pasting news articles, whether from a free site or behind a paywall. To Righthaven, does it matter whether or not the source URL and byline are included?</p>
<p>I wonder in some cases if this is about properly recognizing the written work, or the advertisers that cover the rest of the article&#8217;s page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
