<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Open&#8217; Textbooks Provider Flat World Inks Berteslmann Investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilO</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhilO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brad says: &quot;Flat World Knowledge has a flawed business model. They license their textbooks CC BY SA NC.&quot;

You are mistaken. They license their textbooks as &quot;CC-NC-SA&quot;. Their revenue model depends on students opting in to purchase alternate print and digital versions to the free, HTML version. They have gained traction, and will no doubt be rolled up by Bertelsmann sooner, or later. Remember, Bertelsmann owns Random House, and Random House sold its textbook division some years ago. Bertelsmann has been eyeing companies like Cengage and Houghton. FWK may be their new baby. The big question here becomes whether or not FWK&#039;s affordability model (enabled by Open licensing) will be maintained once they&#039;re rolled up. It&#039;s often the case that when disruptive price plays are rolled up, they lose ground to the bean counters who just bought them. Bertelamann is not known for making, and then growing, successful strategic investments. This will be an interesting one to watch. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brad says: &#8220;Flat World Knowledge has a flawed business model. They license their textbooks CC BY SA NC.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are mistaken. They license their textbooks as &#8220;CC-NC-SA&#8221;. Their revenue model depends on students opting in to purchase alternate print and digital versions to the free, HTML version. They have gained traction, and will no doubt be rolled up by Bertelsmann sooner, or later. Remember, Bertelsmann owns Random House, and Random House sold its textbook division some years ago. Bertelsmann has been eyeing companies like Cengage and Houghton. FWK may be their new baby. The big question here becomes whether or not FWK&#8217;s affordability model (enabled by Open licensing) will be maintained once they&#8217;re rolled up. It&#8217;s often the case that when disruptive price plays are rolled up, they lose ground to the bean counters who just bought them. Bertelamann is not known for making, and then growing, successful strategic investments. This will be an interesting one to watch. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Smith</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelvin Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Berteslmann (sic).  Just one small typo, but it can make a difference to the perceived value of published content. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berteslmann (sic).  Just one small typo, but it can make a difference to the perceived value of published content. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/01/21/419-open-textbooks-provider-flat-world-inks-berteslmann-investment/#comment-81922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flat World Knowledge has a flawed business model. They license their textbooks CC BY SA NC. This license would allowed anyone to host the textbooks for free.

How are they going to make money if someone quite legally gives away what they charge for?

I guess they hope no one does? It&#039;s dumb.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flat World Knowledge has a flawed business model. They license their textbooks CC BY SA NC. This license would allowed anyone to host the textbooks for free.</p>
<p>How are they going to make money if someone quite legally gives away what they charge for?</p>
<p>I guess they hope no one does? It&#8217;s dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
