<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Takes Unusual Approach In Unveiling &#8216;Do Not Track&#8217; Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Loken</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Loken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that people have no problem with Facebook following their every move across the web - via social plugins and exploitative Sponsored Stories - and yet they see an unobtrusive and non-identifying retargeting pixel as a heinous breach of privacy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that people have no problem with Facebook following their every move across the web &#8211; via social plugins and exploitative Sponsored Stories &#8211; and yet they see an unobtrusive and non-identifying retargeting pixel as a heinous breach of privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ghostery was never installed by default. They do mention that even Chrome has privacy plugins. The point here is the politics of it. Out of all the Firefox users out there, how many have Ghostery installed? Compare that to how many will run Firefox 4 in some months...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ghostery was never installed by default. They do mention that even Chrome has privacy plugins. The point here is the politics of it. Out of all the Firefox users out there, how many have Ghostery installed? Compare that to how many will run Firefox 4 in some months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/02/10/419-firefox-takes-unusual-approach-in-unveiling-do-not-track-option/#comment-82355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh. This is not worthy of fireworks. Ghostery has been around for some time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. This is not worthy of fireworks. Ghostery has been around for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
