<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google To Bypass Record Companies, Launching Cloud Music Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastien_Givry</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/#comment-83543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastien_Givry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 09:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/#comment-83543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would go along with you in a sense that Google has more an history (and tradition) to give content free, sometimes without appropriate rights (see recent Belgium court decision about Google &amp; the news medias), rather than generating value for content providers. Major Labels are in that category.

Before imposing your &quot;vision&quot; you must ensure you can create a trustworthy environment. Took many years to Apple to do that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go along with you in a sense that Google has more an history (and tradition) to give content free, sometimes without appropriate rights (see recent Belgium court decision about Google &#038; the news medias), rather than generating value for content providers. Major Labels are in that category.</p>
<p>Before imposing your &#8220;vision&#8221; you must ensure you can create a trustworthy environment. Took many years to Apple to do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iAmJasonPaul</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/#comment-83542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iAmJasonPaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 03:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/05/10/419-report-google-to-bypass-record-companies-launching-cloud-music-service/#comment-83542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like Amazon this seems like more redundancy. It will certainly make Google more money as if they needed it. I don&#039;t thing it does anything to help the current plight of selling digital music. http://wp.me/p17GYi-s


Also, to rain on the parade even more, aside from search, Google has a veeerry poor track record of successful execution of their inventions. Read &#039;Google Must Embrace State-of-the-Design or Fail&#039;: http://wp.me/p17GYi-u


And finally, I must show my true bias. I believe 
@Rdio:twitter
 has thoroughly mapped out a great future for music. It seems to be catching on rather slowly, but I think when it becomes more prevalent this tired, decade long conversation about music will finally change.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like Amazon this seems like more redundancy. It will certainly make Google more money as if they needed it. I don&#8217;t thing it does anything to help the current plight of selling digital music. <a href="http://wp.me/p17GYi-s" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/p17GYi-s</a></p>
<p>Also, to rain on the parade even more, aside from search, Google has a veeerry poor track record of successful execution of their inventions. Read &#8216;Google Must Embrace State-of-the-Design or Fail&#8217;: <a href="http://wp.me/p17GYi-u" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/p17GYi-u</a></p>
<p>And finally, I must show my true bias. I believe<br />
@Rdio:twitter<br />
 has thoroughly mapped out a great future for music. It seems to be catching on rather slowly, but I think when it becomes more prevalent this tired, decade long conversation about music will finally change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
