<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Content Farms Are Hitting The E-Book Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revax</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/#comment-84256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/#comment-84256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty interesting article, now with the Kindle, Ebooks are getting some credit! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting article, now with the Kindle, Ebooks are getting some credit! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/#comment-84255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/06/23/419-the-new-market-for-e-book-spam-content/#comment-84255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confusing article -- PLR seems legal, hence the &quot;Private Label Rights&quot; license.  Why mix this issue with copyright violation, which is altogether different?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confusing article &#8212; PLR seems legal, hence the &#8220;Private Label Rights&#8221; license.  Why mix this issue with copyright violation, which is altogether different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
