<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Righthaven&#8217;s Priciest Slapdown Yet: Ordered To Pay $34,045 In Legal Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/16/419-righthavens-priciest-slapdown-yet-ordered-to-pay-34045-in-legal-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/16/419-righthavens-priciest-slapdown-yet-ordered-to-pay-34045-in-legal-fees/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCS</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/16/419-righthavens-priciest-slapdown-yet-ordered-to-pay-34045-in-legal-fees/#comment-84951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/08/16/419-righthavens-priciest-slapdown-yet-ordered-to-pay-34045-in-legal-fees/#comment-84951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to wonder if we might see those defendants who&#039;ve already settled w/ Righthaven banded together into a class to sue the firm? They&#039;ve undoubtedly signed away any rights to contest the original infringement claims but if Righthaven had no true standing to file suit in the first place could the firm be  for pursued by its victims for fraud or some other systematic abuse of process? Bunch of greedy parasites...hope they get exactly what they deserve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder if we might see those defendants who&#8217;ve already settled w/ Righthaven banded together into a class to sue the firm? They&#8217;ve undoubtedly signed away any rights to contest the original infringement claims but if Righthaven had no true standing to file suit in the first place could the firm be  for pursued by its victims for fraud or some other systematic abuse of process? Bunch of greedy parasites&#8230;hope they get exactly what they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
