<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Facebook Decided To Settle With Lamebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin Joyce</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohin Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the substance of it consists of little more than an aggregation of inane
 Facebook posts pasted under a blue and white logo—hardly the height of 
smart satire.&quot;
I didn&#039;t realise the quality of the satire was an issue, merely that it be staire to begin with. Otherwise we start justifying censorship on the basis of the value of the work, which is (surely) subjective opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the substance of it consists of little more than an aggregation of inane<br />
 Facebook posts pasted under a blue and white logo—hardly the height of<br />
smart satire.&#8221;<br />
I didn&#8217;t realise the quality of the satire was an issue, merely that it be staire to begin with. Otherwise we start justifying censorship on the basis of the value of the work, which is (surely) subjective opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [A]</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[A]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well that was easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well that was easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit Fallenius</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benoit Fallenius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/08/29/419-why-facebook-decided-to-settle-with-lamebook/#comment-85030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To see all trademarks similar to Facebook or Lamebook, do a search at http://www.markify.com .Both marks will return a lot of hits, since they use generic words. 
The parody defense is very hard to fight in media... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see all trademarks similar to Facebook or Lamebook, do a search at http://www.markify.com .Both marks will return a lot of hits, since they use generic words. <br />
The parody defense is very hard to fight in media&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
