<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL, Microsoft And Yahoo Seeking To Form Ad Alliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-aol-microsoft-and-yahoo-seeking-to-form-ad-alliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-aol-microsoft-and-yahoo-seeking-to-form-ad-alliance/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Operative</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-aol-microsoft-and-yahoo-seeking-to-form-ad-alliance/#comment-85255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Operative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/13/419-aol-microsoft-and-yahoo-seeking-to-form-ad-alliance/#comment-85255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is a content play here, this “alliance” may make sense.  But it 
seems as if there are still a lot of details to be ironed out, such as how and 
why a sales person – at say Microsoft – would want to sell his/her competitors 
(Yahoo and/or AOL) inventory?  And how much additional value will each company 
generate by cutting out the ad networks?  At the end of the day, brands still 
need to reach their target audience for the best price possible.  Microsoft, 
Yahoo and AOL will need to ensure they are delivering more value to the brands 
if this alliance is going to work.  If all three had a central “hub” they could 
hook into to view one another’s available inventory, in real-time, and package 
that inventory in a unique way that delivers more value to the brand, this 
concept could work.  Alignment of goals and operations will be key here!
http://www.operative.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a content play here, this “alliance” may make sense.  But it<br />
seems as if there are still a lot of details to be ironed out, such as how and<br />
why a sales person – at say Microsoft – would want to sell his/her competitors<br />
(Yahoo and/or AOL) inventory?  And how much additional value will each company<br />
generate by cutting out the ad networks?  At the end of the day, brands still<br />
need to reach their target audience for the best price possible.  Microsoft,<br />
Yahoo and AOL will need to ensure they are delivering more value to the brands<br />
if this alliance is going to work.  If all three had a central “hub” they could<br />
hook into to view one another’s available inventory, in real-time, and package<br />
that inventory in a unique way that delivers more value to the brand, this<br />
concept could work.  Alignment of goals and operations will be key here!<br />
<a href="http://www.operative.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.operative.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
