<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authors To Universities: Give Up Your Google Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra Reed Lajoux</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/#comment-85242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandra Reed Lajoux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/#comment-85242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the Author&#039;s Guild for its worthy mission and work, but I side with the university libraries on this one. Making orphan works available at a low/zero cost to scholars and students sounds like a great idea to me. I don&#039;t see how digitizing orphan works can harm us authors or our estates, since our works are not orphans. And there is little comparison/competition between demand for the two kinds of works.

As a side note, I have a very good feeling about the long-delayed Google book settlement, which could occur in 2012. Thanks to a wise judiciary and cogent arguments from all parties involved, it&#039;s going to be a big win-win-win. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the Author&#8217;s Guild for its worthy mission and work, but I side with the university libraries on this one. Making orphan works available at a low/zero cost to scholars and students sounds like a great idea to me. I don&#8217;t see how digitizing orphan works can harm us authors or our estates, since our works are not orphans. And there is little comparison/competition between demand for the two kinds of works.</p>
<p>As a side note, I have a very good feeling about the long-delayed Google book settlement, which could occur in 2012. Thanks to a wise judiciary and cogent arguments from all parties involved, it&#8217;s going to be a big win-win-win. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowles2</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/#comment-85241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowles2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/13/419-authors-to-universities-give-up-your-google-books/#comment-85241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they throw in the towel in the Google case. Then surely we are back to the argument on whether Google is able to treat books like it treats websites ie able to scan them freely and create and index of all there content and then allow other people to search that index and see snippets from those books with out informing authors.

 This is exactly what Google does to websites and I do not think anyone has won a legal case against Google for doing that. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they throw in the towel in the Google case. Then surely we are back to the argument on whether Google is able to treat books like it treats websites ie able to scan them freely and create and index of all there content and then allow other people to search that index and see snippets from those books with out informing authors.</p>
<p> This is exactly what Google does to websites and I do not think anyone has won a legal case against Google for doing that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
