<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Overhauling Its Website For &#8216;Swipability&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 13:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a technical standpoint, the site went live on 29 Nov 2011 without support for the Opera browser on the PC, iPhone or Android. Nor does the swipe feature work on iPad - you have to click on tabs on all platforms to scroll sideways which is next to impossible on an iPhone.

It also doesn&#039;t work on any of the readers for the blind, nor does the font scale, enabling use for poorly-sighted viewers. Nor does it, apparently, work on Firefox for Mac.

Far from being a new wave of form and design for the BBC web site, it has attracted a stream of negative criticism for it&#039;s limited content and poor technical proficiency. Comments to the (over 1200) complaints on BBC blogs have met the predictable response of &quot;we&#039;ll be upgrading again soon&quot;.

But for me the technical issue of going live with a unfinished home page, for the 5th largest web site in the UK no less, is an incredible mistake, which shouldn&#039;t be glossed over lightly. 

Outside the (protected job placement of the) BBC, anywhere else I suspect, it would have been a serious error...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a technical standpoint, the site went live on 29 Nov 2011 without support for the Opera browser on the PC, iPhone or Android. Nor does the swipe feature work on iPad - you have to click on tabs on all platforms to scroll sideways which is next to impossible on an iPhone.</p>
<p>It also doesn&#8217;t work on any of the readers for the blind, nor does the font scale, enabling use for poorly-sighted viewers. Nor does it, apparently, work on Firefox for Mac.</p>
<p>Far from being a new wave of form and design for the BBC web site, it has attracted a stream of negative criticism for it&#8217;s limited content and poor technical proficiency. Comments to the (over 1200) complaints on BBC blogs have met the predictable response of &#8221;we&#8217;ll be upgrading again soon&#8221;.</p>
<p>But for me the technical issue of going live with a unfinished home page, for the 5th largest web site in the UK no less, is an incredible mistake, which shouldn&#8217;t be glossed over lightly. </p>
<p>Outside the (protected job placement of the) BBC, anywhere else I suspect, it would have been a serious error&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monirom</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monirom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magnus, dont assume this is wholesale. Smart designers/developers will always design for degradation so users without touch interfaces have the cues needed to navigate a website (mobile and otherwise) without said touch interfaces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magnus, dont assume this is wholesale. Smart designers/developers will always design for degradation so users without touch interfaces have the cues needed to navigate a website (mobile and otherwise) without said touch interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Jern</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus Jern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/21/419-bbc-overhauling-its-website-for-swipabiity/#comment-85342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting! Soon you won&#039;t be able to navigate websites without a touch screen... :) Following usability trends is always interesting but I wonder if enough user experience research have been done to conclude that this is the best UI or if it&#039;s primarily based on iPad users thinking it&#039;s cool. A lot more usability testing will be needed on touch screens during the next couple of years to truly understand what makes a great user experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! Soon you won&#8217;t be able to navigate websites without a touch screen&#8230; :) Following usability trends is always interesting but I wonder if enough user experience research have been done to conclude that this is the best UI or if it&#8217;s primarily based on iPad users thinking it&#8217;s cool. A lot more usability testing will be needed on touch screens during the next couple of years to truly understand what makes a great user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
