<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview: Lonely Planet CEO Travels Toward 50/50 Media Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-interview-lonely-planet-ceo-travels-toward-5050-media-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-interview-lonely-planet-ceo-travels-toward-5050-media-balance/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremyhead</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-interview-lonely-planet-ceo-travels-toward-5050-media-balance/#comment-85411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremyhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/26/419-interview-lonely-planet-ceo-travels-toward-5050-media-balance/#comment-85411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be interested to know more about the BBC relationship. I still think it makes a strange bedfellow, and interestingly they stopped publishing the Lonely Planet magazine themselves in favour of letting Exponet a third party do it. Seems like they really don&#039;t know quite what they want from the relationship?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know more about the BBC relationship. I still think it makes a strange bedfellow, and interestingly they stopped publishing the Lonely Planet magazine themselves in favour of letting Exponet a third party do it. Seems like they really don&#8217;t know quite what they want from the relationship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
