<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung: Second Tablet Injunction? Asks 2.4 Percent Chip Royalty From Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/09/26/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/#comment-85414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/09/26/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/#comment-85414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;—Samsung, according to Apple, is demanding 2.4 percent of the price of each chip to be paid in royalties. Considering that Samsung supplied Apple with $5.7 billion in components last year alone (although that figure would include more than just chips) that could mean a hefty royalty payment.&quot;

That must be a mistake. I can&#039;t believe that Samsung is asking for royalty payments on their own chips. Apple&#039;s critics complain about an &quot;Apple Tax&quot;. I wonder what they would say about his?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;—Samsung, according to Apple, is demanding 2.4 percent of the price of each chip to be paid in royalties. Considering that Samsung supplied Apple with $5.7 billion in components last year alone (although that figure would include more than just chips) that could mean a hefty royalty payment.&#8221;</p>
<p>That must be a mistake. I can&#8217;t believe that Samsung is asking for royalty payments on their own chips. Apple&#8217;s critics complain about an &#8220;Apple Tax&#8221;. I wonder what they would say about his?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
