<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Legal To TiVo The Radio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/06/419-is-it-legal-to-tivo-the-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/06/419-is-it-legal-to-tivo-the-radio/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/06/419-is-it-legal-to-tivo-the-radio/#comment-85573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/10/06/419-is-it-legal-to-tivo-the-radio/#comment-85573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my company&#039;s products, PlayLater, offers a similar time-shifting service for online (video) content, and we encounter legality questions from media on a daily basis. We echo Michael&#039;s position that personal recording of legally accessible content for the purpose of time-shifting constitutes consumer fair-use under copyright law.  Further, the mere act of moving one&#039;s personal recording from one device to another in no way constitutes &quot;distribution to others&quot;.  Consumers should be (and by law, are) able to watch broadcast content when and where they want, and through the device of their choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my company&#8217;s products, PlayLater, offers a similar time-shifting service for online (video) content, and we encounter legality questions from media on a daily basis. We echo Michael&#8217;s position that personal recording of legally accessible content for the purpose of time-shifting constitutes consumer fair-use under copyright law.  Further, the mere act of moving one&#8217;s personal recording from one device to another in no way constitutes &#8220;distribution to others&#8221;.  Consumers should be (and by law, are) able to watch broadcast content when and where they want, and through the device of their choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
