http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/22/419-judge-puts-screws-to-ceglia-lawyer-in-facebook-case/ The economics of digital content Thu, 23 May 2013 21:30:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/22/419-judge-puts-screws-to-ceglia-lawyer-in-facebook-case/#comment-85804 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:11:00 +0000 http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/10/22/419-judge-puts-screws-to-ceglia-lawyer-in-facebook-case/#comment-85804 I have being following this story since the start and have seen a lot of
evidence on Ceglias side which is not being broadcasted because it is
damning to FB. Why isnt the expert views in favour of Ceglia who all
agree Ceglia’s evidence is authentic? .Lets take this simple fact of
email preservation, Ceglia and Zuckerberg used a program called Webmail
to email eachother and anyone with any computer knowledge knows that
Webmail deletes sent email in order to avoid exceeding storage limits.
So according to Ceglia he copied the headers and texts of these emails
into word documents in 03-04 in order to not loose them by leaving them
in Webmail to be deleted at a later date and put them on floppy
discs..comouter forensic expert Jerry Gran after analyzing them says
they are consistent with how Ceglia says he copied and saved them here
is a link to Ceglias Lawyers website it contains grants evidence along
with others and i have to say its quite convincing http://bolandlegal.com/site/ceglia-emails-to-zuckerberg-are-authentic-and-they-are-blockbusters
.. Ther is much more evidence you just have to look at the facts,,
unfortunately the media is refusing to report such facts. Or what about
Michael McGowans biased analysis of Ceglias computer, at while ago
McGowan outlined a framework on how to find out the authencity of such
things, he used them on Ceglias computer but refused to use the same
framework when analysing the computers of Zuckerberg 

]]>