<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CJR: Poynter&#039;s &#039;Incomplete Attribution&#039; Problem Goes Beyond Romenesko</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fragtown</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/#comment-86114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fragtown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/#comment-86114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, it goes deeper that just Poynter. I watch sites like BoingBoing build huge audiences with techniques that would get them thrown out of school for plagiarism. They spend five seconds writing two seconds of introduction for a big, fat blockquote. They knock off their posts in ten minutes. Anyone can have a great blog filled with great pictures if you plagiarize. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it goes deeper that just Poynter. I watch sites like BoingBoing build huge audiences with techniques that would get them thrown out of school for plagiarism. They spend five seconds writing two seconds of introduction for a big, fat blockquote. They knock off their posts in ten minutes. Anyone can have a great blog filled with great pictures if you plagiarize. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muckety</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/#comment-86113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muckety]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/11/12/419-cjr-poynters-incomplete-attribution-problem-goes-farther-than-romenesko/#comment-86113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#039;s role in this could be pretty central, and from what I&#039;ve read, so far largely unaddressed.

The supreme driver of traffic favors more text but penalizes sites for over-aggregating, particularly if the text has appeared elsewhere first. Boundaries are ever-changing, and aggregators wandering into this DMZ can be decimated.

Wonder what sort of discussions at Poynter preceded the debut of &quot;Romenesko+&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s role in this could be pretty central, and from what I&#8217;ve read, so far largely unaddressed.</p>
<p>The supreme driver of traffic favors more text but penalizes sites for over-aggregating, particularly if the text has appeared elsewhere first. Boundaries are ever-changing, and aggregators wandering into this DMZ can be decimated.</p>
<p>Wonder what sort of discussions at Poynter preceded the debut of &#8220;Romenesko+&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
