<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicago Sun-Times Papers Add Metered Paywalls &#8212; But Not For Roger Ebert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBrett</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a good idea on their part. Digital ad revenue is still worth a lot less to newspapers than print ad revenue, so the logical strategy is to try and maintain the latter as long as possible while not completely closing off the former. The &lt;em&gt;Chicago Sun-Tribune&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s strategy handles that pretty well, since the &quot;20 articles a month&quot; means that you can still get a taste of their online content without rendering getting a subscription entirely pointless. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a good idea on their part. Digital ad revenue is still worth a lot less to newspapers than print ad revenue, so the logical strategy is to try and maintain the latter as long as possible while not completely closing off the former. The <em>Chicago Sun-Tribune</em>&#8216;s strategy handles that pretty well, since the &#8220;20 articles a month&#8221; means that you can still get a taste of their online content without rendering getting a subscription entirely pointless. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funktron</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Funktron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[








What they (and others... hint: NYT) should do is auction off their articles to sites who want the content.  If they&#039;re truly the de facto standard in quality news reporting, big money will be spent to attain their work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they (and others&#8230; hint: NYT) should do is auction off their articles to sites who want the content.  If they&#8217;re truly the de facto standard in quality news reporting, big money will be spent to attain their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuakarp</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshuakarp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/07/419-chicago-sun-times-papers-add-metered-paywalls/#comment-86547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they should have removed all of their content (short of summaries) from their web site and forced people to buy the print edition to get it. Online, they could have functionality that allowed people to interact around their content, and offer the ability to conduct transactions, i.e. buying, with group deals to give people discounts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should have removed all of their content (short of summaries) from their web site and forced people to buy the print edition to get it. Online, they could have functionality that allowed people to interact around their content, and offer the ability to conduct transactions, i.e. buying, with group deals to give people discounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
