<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outbrain Adds Another $35 Million For European Expansion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/14/419-outbrain-adds-another-34-million-for-european-expansion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/14/419-outbrain-adds-another-34-million-for-european-expansion/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/14/419-outbrain-adds-another-34-million-for-european-expansion/#comment-86644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/14/419-outbrain-adds-another-34-million-for-european-expansion/#comment-86644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive seen these outbrain links on various sites but they are not marked as advertising or sponsored.  How do they get away with this when everyone else has to clearly mark paid links as such?  Some of the more credible publishers like NY Times have marked them correctly but most other havent and they are going to get in trouble for this with their users and the FTC.  You cant take money for featuring something and not disclose that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive seen these outbrain links on various sites but they are not marked as advertising or sponsored.  How do they get away with this when everyone else has to clearly mark paid links as such?  Some of the more credible publishers like NY Times have marked them correctly but most other havent and they are going to get in trouble for this with their users and the FTC.  You cant take money for featuring something and not disclose that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
