<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#039;s Coming In 2012: The Age Of Ubiquity (For Some)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Polakoff</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Polakoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m absolutely willing to pay content delivery devices; to withstand
 advertising/sponsorship to underwrite the cost of entertainment/news
delivery; and to pay for content – these tenets have always been true. 
The mix, though, is going to change, and my behavior will be changing
with it; cost will become more of a factor than before. 

I spend more time than ever before in my daily consumption of
entertainment/news content.  To restore balance in my life, I’m going to
 seek a more discretionary attitude in time spent, content consumed, and
 dollars budgeted. Between and amongst content delivery sources, content providers, advertisers/sponsors and me, there will be winners and losers.  I do not expect to be in the loser category.  The loser(s) will be that which is arrogant and fails to realize the consumer is now in control.

David Polakoff, http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m absolutely willing to pay content delivery devices; to withstand<br />
 advertising/sponsorship to underwrite the cost of entertainment/news<br />
delivery; and to pay for content – these tenets have always been true. <br />
The mix, though, is going to change, and my behavior will be changing<br />
with it; cost will become more of a factor than before. </p>
<p>I spend more time than ever before in my daily consumption of<br />
entertainment/news content.  To restore balance in my life, I’m going to<br />
 seek a more discretionary attitude in time spent, content consumed, and<br />
 dollars budgeted. Between and amongst content delivery sources, content providers, advertisers/sponsors and me, there will be winners and losers.  I do not expect to be in the loser category.  The loser(s) will be that which is arrogant and fails to realize the consumer is now in control.</p>
<p>David Polakoff, <a href="http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://davidpolakoff.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Drost</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Drost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article. As older generations get into mulit-device content (iPad, TV, computer, smartphone) you see more and more expectations of ubiquitous content and a willingness to pay for it. Would anyone subscribe to Netflix if you could only stream via a browser? Despite the cost of development and rights negotiations, any content distributor has to have a strategy to offer anywhere anytime content moving forward. The time and difficulties of HBO Go/Time Warner Cable show just hard but critical this is. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. As older generations get into mulit-device content (iPad, TV, computer, smartphone) you see more and more expectations of ubiquitous content and a willingness to pay for it. Would anyone subscribe to Netflix if you could only stream via a browser? Despite the cost of development and rights negotiations, any content distributor has to have a strategy to offer anywhere anytime content moving forward. The time and difficulties of HBO Go/Time Warner Cable show just hard but critical this is. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBrett</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2011/12/31/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/#comment-86841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s one possible way to preserve revenue in the face of change, especially since downloading video can still be a pain for many Americans as opposed to streaming it. I wouldn&#039;t be shocked if most newspapers went this way in the next 1-2 years, since it allows them to keep most of their revenue as long as their print subscriber base continues to pay for it.

I think the bigger concern is that they&#039;ll preserve a temporarily sustainable &quot;corner&quot; of content distribution, at the expense of new subscribers and poorer customers in the international market. Cable is becoming increasingly expensive, and it really depends on people being unwilling to time-shift in the months (and to a lesser extent, pirate). They can justify the anemic subscriber growth right now due to the economy, but if it continues for another 5-10 years, you&#039;ll likely see them go back to the drawing board for new distribution plans.

I also wonder about the effect a delay (like the Hulu 8-days) will have on the fan communities many shows have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one possible way to preserve revenue in the face of change, especially since downloading video can still be a pain for many Americans as opposed to streaming it. I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if most newspapers went this way in the next 1-2 years, since it allows them to keep most of their revenue as long as their print subscriber base continues to pay for it.</p>
<p>I think the bigger concern is that they&#8217;ll preserve a temporarily sustainable &#8220;corner&#8221; of content distribution, at the expense of new subscribers and poorer customers in the international market. Cable is becoming increasingly expensive, and it really depends on people being unwilling to time-shift in the months (and to a lesser extent, pirate). They can justify the anemic subscriber growth right now due to the economy, but if it continues for another 5-10 years, you&#8217;ll likely see them go back to the drawing board for new distribution plans.</p>
<p>I also wonder about the effect a delay (like the Hulu 8-days) will have on the fan communities many shows have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
