<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New York Times vs. Mail Online: Who&#8217;s Got The Better Business Model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Abd Al-Hameed</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/#comment-87480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammad Abd Al-Hameed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/#comment-87480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is not that a practical model is not available but that NYT is not willing to consider an out-of-the-box solution. I offered them a plan to create a new revenue stream that could get them substantial money, while they continued with their paper and digital editions. I have yet to hear from them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not that a practical model is not available but that NYT is not willing to consider an out-of-the-box solution. I offered them a plan to create a new revenue stream that could get them substantial money, while they continued with their paper and digital editions. I have yet to hear from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robelroy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/#comment-87479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robelroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/01/29/419-new-york-times-ocertaken-by-mail-online-for-now/#comment-87479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real story is on page 22 of their latest 10q.  The flagship paper is now revenue positive.  The gains in circulation (paywall) beat the loss in ad revenue by two million dollars.  Think about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real story is on page 22 of their latest 10q.  The flagship paper is now revenue positive.  The gains in circulation (paywall) beat the loss in ad revenue by two million dollars.  Think about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
